Who might have thought that Jewish style accuracy in reporting would open the door to demonstrate the illegitimacy of the entity they call Israel? Thanks to Chloe Greenfield of the so-called Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting, this is what happened.
To
argue her case, Chloe Greenfield wrote an article that misfired. It came under
the title: “The push to ‘other’ the identities of Israeli Jews,” and the
subtitle: “Anti-Semitic groups on college campuses level accusations that
Israel is some kind of white, colonialist endeavor, neglecting the fact that
the country is primarily composed of people of color.” It was published on June
23, 2021 in Jewish News Syndicate.
Greenfield’s
point is that “Israel’s founding is a story of liberation, not of colonialism.”
Well, liberation means conflict that leads to combat. Carried to extreme, this
means terror carried out by armed groups against mainly unarmed civilians in an
effort to steal their properties. Greenfield has skipped telling this part of
the story, and went on to say the following:
“Jews
and Arabs lived in what was the British Mandate of Palestine. This territory
included what is now Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, and not a country named ‘Palestine.’
No such country ever existed. With the impending expiry of the mandate, in
November 1947 the UN General Assembly recommended partitioning the land into
two states—one for Jews, encompassing areas of a Jewish majority, and one for
Arabs in an Arab-majority area”.
Beside
omitting the role that terrorism has played in her story, the above passage
contains an irrelevance that’s born out of intellectual dishonesty of the kind
that only Jews are capable of committing. The irrelevance is this: “No such
country [Palestine] ever existed.” The intent here is to fashion a tailor-made
rule on the spot; one that would serve the interests of Jews and only the Jews for
this occasion.
The
idea behind it all is this: Because it can be falsely alleged that no
independent country in modern time was called Palestine, terrorists from Europe
— organized under the names, Irgun and Hagenah — had the right to invade the
territory which, Greenfield admits was called “Mandate of Palestine,” and rename
it Israel against the will of the indigenous population that lived there since
the beginning of time. What can be more intellectually crooked than this? What
can be more Jewish than this?
And
so, to inject a modicum of honesty in the debate, we factor into the discussion
the historical reality that White European terrorism has played a decisive role
in getting the situation in occupied Palestine to where it is today. To that
end, we need to recall that since the beginning of recorded history, the number
of Jews in any country has never exceeded the one or two percent level of the
population. The same was true in Palestine where the majority of the population
was Muslim and Christian.
It
then occurred to someone named Ze’ev Jabotinsky that the world was in such a
mess, it was ripe for a Jewish terrorist organization to go fight both the
Brits who were in charge of the Mandate of Palestine, and the indigenous
Palestinian farmers who never saw a gun or knew what it was used for. And so, Jabotinsky
formed the Irgun terrorist organization because in his view, “Only Jewish armed
force would ensure the Jewish state.” His terror organization later splintered
into several other groups, chief among them, the savage Hagenah.
But
take note of this, my friend, take note of this: None of the terror groups were
composed of Palestinian Jews, or any Arab, Asian or African Jews. They were
mostly Yiddish-speaking White European Jews with a few who spoke unaccented
European languages. Realizing that they were a small minority in Palestine, the
Jewish terrorists implemented a two-pronged plan. One, they called on Jews
everywhere in the world to come settle in Israel. Two, they killed or chased
the Palestinian farmers out of their lands, forcing them to seek refuge in the
neighboring Arab countries.
From
the outset, the White European Jews established themselves as bosses in every
field of government and public affairs. To this day, they are making it
impossible for other Jews to occupy a position of authority, however small it
may be.
When
there came a time during which the debate concerning the human condition rested
on the idea that the world was divided into two halves, one being the
industrious North, and the other being the backward South, some commentators
began to make the point that the division was pitting the White North against
the Colored South. Amid the uproar, two self-identifying voices pierced through
the noise, and made a claim that shall remain tattooed on their foreheads
forever.
One
voice was that of the Soviets that had invaded Afghanistan by invitation from
the local government. The criticism of the Soviets in America was so intense,
the Soviets asked the Americans to tone down that criticism if only because
they were the White people of the North trying to tame and civilize the colored
people of the South.
This
happened at about the same time that the Palestinian resistance against the
occupation was intensifying. In response, the Israelis adopted tactics that
were criticized by the Europeans. When some American media began to echo the
Europeans, America’s Jews reminded the politico-journalists of the Beltway that
Israel was made of White European Jews who must not be criticized. In making
that statement, the Jews ignored the existence of other groups in Israel the
way that you would ignore how many pieces of furniture were present in a dance
hall containing a hundred human guests.
So
now that the glossy image of the industrious White has been replaced by the
terror of White Supremacists, the forever shifty Jews — Chloe Greenfield among
them — have changed their mind about who they are. No, no, no, says Chloe; we
are not White, we are colored.
Just
imagine Ivanka Trump wearing a black face, appropriating an African hairdo, and
pretending she was never a White woman.
And what about Chloe Greenfield? Does she see herself as a
white-skinned Jewish Palestinian from the no-name land of the Philistines? Or
what exactly is she?
Pray tell in the name of accuracy in reporting.