If you want to know how an ode of lamentations for the loss of a war, sounds like, read the article that came under the title: “Why are liberal Jews still covering for Ilhan Omar?” It was written by Jonathan S. Tobin, and published on July 1, 2021 in Jewish News Syndicate.
There
is only a limited number of attacks on Ilhan Omar in this article by the man
who spearheaded the previous attacks on her, inspiring and encouraging others
to copycat him, even try to outdo him. What happened that caused him to abandon
the savage attacks, at least temporarily, is that he finally began to realize
how futile his approach has been. What’s left for him to do during the coming
period, is engage in finger pointing, mourn the loss of the war he started,
regret starting the war without adequate preparations, and lament an outcome he
failed to anticipate.
But
did Jonathan Tobin give any indication to the effect that he learned enough
from this experience, never to repeat it? No, he did not. In fact, in doing
finger pointing at those who did not join his bandwagon when he attacked Omar, he
seems to try shaming them so as to force them into joining him when he resumes
the attack on Omar and her colleagues in the group known as the Squad.
Why
did Jonathan Tobin fail in his previous attempt, and might he fail again? The
answer is that future failures are a certainty even if he has the smarts to
understand why he failed the first time, and tried to avoid repeating the
previous mistakes. He’ll fail because in attacking Ilhan Omar who is a duly
elected Member of the House Representatives, he attacks the Constitution of the
United States. This means he can only win by totally obliterating the American
democracy, which if he succeeded, he’ll find himself buried alive alongside the
remains of Adolph Hitler.
How
did Jonathan Tobin and the other Jewish Fifth Columnists paralyze and almost
strangle to death the Constitution of the United States? The best way to answer
this question is to take an example and analyze it. Here it is:
A
while ago, House Representative Ilhan Omar gave a speech in which she discussed
a historical event. Her point was that a serious effect was inflicted on an
innocent community that had nothing to do with the cause that led to the effect
in the first place. The cause was the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers. The
effect was the difficult time that innocent Muslims were forced to endure in
America. Omar started her comments with the words: “Some people did something…”
This is what caused thousands of Jewish bellies to explode, spilling enough
entrails to start a river that continues to flood the public square to this day.
What’s wrong with that, beside the nauseating condition that all of America is
forced to endure?
To
answer this question, we need to understand something about the interplay
between a language and the culture that develops around it. They live a
symbiotic existence and evolve together. You know this to be true because what
was groovy in the culture of the 1960s was no longer cool in the culture of the
1990’s and beyond. In practical terms, an older person speaking in the jargon
of his generation to a young audience will annoy it. The impact in this case
will range from minimal to embarrassing. It is also what happens when tourists
travel to different cultures and live embarrassing moments due to the “loss in
translation” which they experience when communicating with the locals.
But
as always, this reality proved to be a goldmine for the Jews who do not let an
opportunity pass them without exploiting it. In this case, they acquired an
empty basket, and filled it with tropes, figures of speech, code words and what
have you. Most of these were imported from the cultures that the Jews had lived
in Europe and Asia centuries ago.
Whether
someone deliberately said something annoying to the Jews, or said it
innocently; whether or not it was rooted in any of the European or Asian
cultures of the past, the Jewish rabbis on a mission to conquer America,
pounced on that someone and accused him of using code words meant to incite
hatred for the Jews. They demanded that the culprit retract what he said and
apologize, apologize, apologize.
When
use of this trick became excessive and tedious, it began to lose its capacity
to intimidate and silence others. And the Jewish rabbis had to invent a new way
to accomplish the same old goals.
A
notable use of the new trick, is what the Jews pulled on Ilhan Omar when she
said, “Some people did something…” They exploded their bellies even if there was
nothing unusual in those words or in the form of speech where they were used or
in any of the foreign cultures from where the Jews had come.
What
the Jews did, in effect, was start a habit of nitpicking on what people like
Omar say or do, and they fake a state of anger so intense, they force a newly
invented meaning (however nebulous it may be) to what is essentially an ordinary
expression. But the essential thing is that they become masters of the moment,
surrounded by a confused crowd that cannot make out what the hell the Jews are
talking about.
To
make the confusion work for them in America and Europe, perhaps on other
continents as well, the Jews came up with a new definition for “antisemitism”
so that they’ll be able on the spot, to designate as offensive trope, any word
or expression uttered by someone they do not like. That may someday include
you, my friend, not just Ilhan Omar.
Let
the Jews take this trend to its illogical conclusion, and they will someday
insist that you apologize for saying something like, “what a beautiful sunny
day this is.” They’ll accuse you of uttering an antisemitic trope meant to
incite the public, and have it rise to pogrom or holocaust the Jews.
And when this happens, the only good thing that will come out of the US Constitution, is that it may be recycled for use as toilet paper.