In adding his voice to the ongoing debate about the need to tell or to hide the truth, Jimmy Quinn has exposed the full extent of the evil tapestry that was infused into the American culture by the rabbis who worked on conquering America as far back as half a century ago.
At
the start of his article, Quinn told his readers what it was that prompted him
to write the piece which he did. He said this: “Secretary of State Antony
Blinken issued a cable to American embassies worldwide, encouraging diplomats
to reckon honestly with the darkest chapters of US history.” Quinn went on to
quote the following passage from Blinken’s cable: “That means we acknowledge
our imperfections. We don’t sweep them under the rug. We confront them openly
and transparently”.
Quinn’s
article came under the title: “Antony Blinken’s Risky Wager,” and was published
on July 16, 2021 in National Review Online.” Whereas Blinken’s performance would
give any well-adjusted reader great satisfaction at the aura of honesty that’s
starting to blow in American politics under a new administration, it is not how
Jimmy Quinn feels about the matter. Instead, this is how he expressed his
sentiment: “Blinken is poised to further aggravate the controversy over racism
and human rights in US foreign policy that he stirred this week”.
Quinn’s
beef is that America’s foes have weaponized American history to their own ends.
Is this guy, Jimmy Quinn for real? Or does he believe his readers are idiots?
Who in the world does not know about America’s colossal effort to destabilize
other countries with broadcasts that came and continue to come after a quarter
of a century — under such names as Radio Free Europe and Voice of America? Now
that the other countries have decided to give America some of its own medicine,
“weapons, weapons, they weaponize our history,” cry the knee jerking pundits of
the American media.
From
where do you think, Jimmy Quinn got those ideas? In case you missed it, here is
the passage that answers that question: “This has drawn fire from conservatives
who view the move as an act of self-flagellation. This is INSANE, former US
ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley told Fox News.” She explained that
authoritarian regimes will exploit the opportunity to weaponize the reckonings
with slavery and other historical ills.
What
Nikki Hailey did not explain is why she thinks those regimes have waited for
Antony Blinken to talk about America’s human rights record to weaponize the
thing when in reality, Blinken made the move that he did in response to the
concerns that the foreigners have been raising about America talking a noble
discourse about human rights, while at the same time wiping its mouth with
hands that drip with the blood of the innocent Blacks in its midst.
Moreover,
according to Quinn himself, this is not the first time that China — which is
supposedly one of the authoritarian regimes — has pointed its finger at the
hypocrisy of a so-called democratic country. It did so to point out that
Canada’s treatment of its indigenous population does not look any better than
China’s treatment of its minority populations.
Another
utterance of Nikki Haley that points to the bizarre nature of the knowledge
which the Jews pumped into her skull when she was at the United Nations, is the
saying that America must whitewash its own history lest the authoritarian
regimes whitewash their history. Does this not mean, let’s become authoritarian
so that the authoritarians become democratic? Or did she mean something else?
By
now, this line of thinking had gotten so messy, Jimmy Quinn could not wait to
hit the escape button. He did so, and then turned the argument on its head.
Here is how he did that:
“Conservatives
criticizing Blinken’s move should acknowledge that
there’s a method, one that could sound solid in principle. This approach to
discussing human rights can also be something like a high-stakes wager. Blinken
hopes that by addressing America’s own historical injustices, Washington’s
competitors will look far worse by comparison when they stonewall efforts to
highlight their human-rights atrocities”.
Whereas
this sounds like the start of a good competition for telling the truth between
opposite regimes, it is unfortunate that Quinn could not stay with it. He
quickly plunged into the cesspool of crass politics, thus demonstrated a
crucial difference between the “reviled” regimes of the East and the “beloved”
regimes of the West. It is that the East has reformed and continues to reform
whereas the “West’ was and remains averse to reforming even after it reckoned
that it is rotten to the core in some places. Here is how Quinn has played the
dirty game of the democracies:
“Acknowledging
[the truth] among friends, is different from doing so at the UN Human Rights
Council. At the most recent session, the Biden administration hailed the
passage of a resolution on police brutality and discrimination against Africans
and people of African descent, including in the US. The problems with this are
many. The council’s authoritarian members continue to play a significant role
in its proceedings. Last year, amid the worldwide protests for racial justice
sparked by the killing of George Floyd, they took the occasion of a council
debate to castigate Washington’s human-rights record. There’s nothing
wrong with America’s top diplomat speaking honestly about his country’s
history. But where he does that matters, and with whom he does that can either
show weakness, or be an effective strategy with which to promote human rights
in the world”.
In essence, Jimmy Quinn is saying: We have two sides to the mouth for a reason. Let’s use one side for talking among ourselves, and the other side for talking in a world forum such as the United Nations. So very disgusting. So very Jewish.