Governments in the advanced societies, be they liberal democracies or otherwise, observe the strict rule of being unbiased, one way or the other, toward the various ethnicities that make up their society.
This
does not go well with the Jews wherever they happen to be because they think of
themselves as a chosen people. And so, they do what they can to stand out as
being different and superior to all those around them. In addition, the Jews
try something else if and when they can get away with it. What they do is nudge
the government to privilege them by imposing their will and their demands on
the rest of society.
In
most places where the Jews get away with this kind of behavior, they do things with
subtlety as much as they can, and so do the governments that privilege them.
But there is one place in this world where the Jews do not need to be subtle,
and neither does the government, which they use like a beast of burden. That would
be the United States of America where Jews openly behave like monarchs, are
treated as such by the government, and expect to be worshipped by the rest of
society.
To
the surprise of some Jewish leaders, however, things are beginning to change in
America, and their surprise is turning into anger. One Jew that is angry and
cannot keep it a secret is Jonathan S. Tobin who always saw himself as being above
the other Jewish leaders to begin with. He is so horrified by the changes that
are taking place in America, he wrote an article to express his sentiments.
Whereas this is a way for him to vent his anger, it is a way for us to learn
how the Jews used to do things with subtlety in the past, and get away with
what is now considered to be unthinkable behavior.
Jonathan
Tobin’s article came under the title: “Is it ever OK to praise the ‘truth’ of
an anti-Semitic blood libel?” and the subtitle: “The vice president not only
failed to challenge a student who smeared Israel, but praised her instead. What
does this say about campus culture and politicians who see the hard-left as
their party’s base?” The article was published on October 1, 2021 in the Jewish
News Syndicate.
What
follows is the story behind the controversy as narrated by Jonathan Tobin.
Considered a preamble to his discussion, it is presented here in condensed
form:
“After giving a brief talk at a university,
Kamala Harris took questions from students. One of them launched into a
diatribe where she contrasted the protests and demonstrations on behalf of
Palestine with the fact that Congress had passed funding for Israel. The
student said, Israel’s existence is an expression of ethnic genocide. She went
on to say that the money should have gone to health care. Rather than push back,
Harris responded with a lecture about pluralism and the need for activism. Said
Harris: Your voice, your perspective, your experience, your truth cannot be
suppressed, and it must be heard”.
As
can be seen, it was as early as the preamble that Jonathan Tobin began to
editorialize as to what Vice President Kamala Harris should have done in
response to a student who stated she would have preferred to see the billion
dollars spent on the health care of Americans rather than the Israeli genocide
of Palestinians. In response, Jonathan Tobin has vehemently argued that the
Vice President should have pushed back against what he termed, that libelous
and anti-Semitic statement.
To
validate his argument, Jonathan Tobin resorted to the use of a tricky method
that is as Jewish as matzoh bread. He attacked Kamala Harris by dragging out and
reciting old stories and opinions that were levelled against her during past
electoral campaigns. They would be stories and opinions whose veracity no one,
that is interested in the current discussion, was going to verify or spend time
establishing how they might relate to the current discussion. In fact, what
Tobin did is what Jews often do, which is the moral equivalent of dredging
buckets of stuff from the sewer and throwing it all over the public square to
distract the attendees and shut them up while the Jew yells his case using a
megaphone.
And
so, having the public square all to himself, Jonathan Tobin went about reciting
what happened during the few days that followed. He did so not as a
dispassionate historian interested in leaving a record for the future, but in
the way that the extreme partisan which he is, wished history had developed. In
so doing, Jonathan Tobin gave himself an old weapon that proved its
effectiveness in the past. It proved to be extremely useful at the start of the
Jewish conquest of America. Here is the weapon as used by Tobin this time
around: “Such sentiments, in the United States and elsewhere, led to
anti-Semitic violence on campus and off”.
In
fact, accusing others of leading to anti-Semitic violence by refusing to do
what the Jews commanded them doing, had been the most powerful weapon in the
arsenal of the Jewish leaders. Using it, they managed to silence every
criticism of themselves and the causes they advocated, thus made it sound like
they were perfect and deserving of all the credit, whereas everyone else was
defective and in need of Jewish guidance to learn and to improve.
Until
this happens, Jonathan Tobin wants America and the world to know that Kamala
Harris is not up to the job of Vice President. With him saying this, and other
Jews saying that Joe Biden is not up to the job of President, Americans are to
conclude that the Jews are advocating a regime change in America.
Does this mean we should expect to see a Jewish version of January 6?