Some readers may remember what JINSA stands for. Yes, it stands for “Jewish Institute for National Security of America,” but it also has a well-publicized agenda, which it labors relentlessly to implement.
You’ll
know what the outfit stands for when you look at its logo. It is made of two
integrated parts: One part representing Israel’s Star of David; the other representing
America’s flag. The combination intends to project the notion that the two
parts make up one team, where America plays the role of the mule, and Israel
plays the role of the mule driver.
The
most outrageous demand that JINSA made of America, was to immediately give
Israel something like 24 billion dollars, and military equipment that would arm
every Israeli to the teeth. JINSA then wanted the two to start negotiating a
new stream of funding for Israel. The understanding was that this stream will
surpass the $3.8 billion a year already in effect, and that it will go on indefinitely
but with an automatic yearly increase that will by far surpass the rate of
inflation.
But
what was it that prompted JINSA to make that demand, anyway? It was the same
old contention. It was the claim that every Jew and every Jewess and their
cousins had been shouting from the rooftops in support of Netanyahu’s
continuous lie, repeated at the United Nations when he falsely asserted that
Iran was a moment’s away from producing the bomb with which Iran intended to
holocaust Israel the way that the Jews were holocausted decades earlier. Thus,
the need for Israel to protect itself, said the Jews, with American weapons and
American money, money, money.
But
guess what’s happening now, my friend. You’ll find it hard to believe that the
same JINSA is now accusing Iran of lying for making statements, not to the
effect that it is a moment away from producing the bomb, but that it is only
making modest progress in the stockpiling of enriched uranium. Not even that,
says JINSA, asserting that Iran is far, far away from having enough highly
enriched uranium to produce even one bomb. As to the old claim that Iran was a
moment away from producing the bomb, the answer to that silly claim comes out
like this: What bomb? Nobody said anything about a bomb. Did you hear anyone
talk about a bomb?
Why
is JINSA doing this now? Well, it is making the new claim for the same reason
that it was making the opposite claim. Whether Iran is close to producing the
bomb or far away from that goal, JINSA is telling America, this is why it must
antagonize Iran; must keep the maximum pressure campaign on, must arm and fund
Israel, and have all the options on the table, ready to destroy Iran when the
time will come.
You
can see all of that yourself when you study the article that came under the
title: “Don’t believe Iran’s Claims of Another Nuclear Milestone,” and the
subtitle: “Tehran claims to have nearly enough enriched uranium for a nuclear
weapon, but this is just a ploy to extract concessions in negotiations.” The
article was co-authored by the two JINSA pranksters, Blaise Misztal and
Jonathan Ruhe, and was published on October 29, 2021 in The National Interest.
The
question now is this: How do the Jews manage to assert things and their
opposites without revolting their audiences, but only causing them to yawn with
tired boredom? This is a good question. Luckily, however, a passage in the
Misztal and Ruhe article may provide just enough light to answer it. Here, in
condensed form, is how that passage reads:
“The latest IAEA data indicates Iran’s
output of 60 percent uranium is too small to reduce the time required to
produce enough material for a nuclear weapon. It had far less 20 percent
uranium in June than it asserted. Its latest claim of 120 kilograms of 20
percent enriched uranium is misleading. At current rates, it won’t have a
bomb’s worth until mid-2022 at the earliest. Iran is being
deceptive because its enriched stockpiles are the easiest metric of
progress toward a bomb. Tehran hopes to scare Biden into paying any
price to keep it from crossing the threshold. Days earlier, it suggested
Washington should release $10 billion in frozen Iranian funds before it
would resume negotiations”.
What the passage shows is that to assert a
point in a discussion on a favorite subject, the Jews will quote statistics
that were cited in a different context, process all that through the prism of a
convenient interpretation concerning the numbers, then make a false assertion to
begin the discussion. In this case, the IAEA had reported on figures that apply
to Iran’s civilian nuclear program, whereas JINSA chose to discuss those
figures in conjunction with a military program that the Iranians never had and
never will.
Having
done this, we see Misztal and Ruhe go on to apply the same mentality to the
discussion on Iran’s production and use of the early and the more advanced
centrifuges. This allows us to make a general observation about the credibility
of the Jews when it comes to the technological breakthroughs they claim were
made by Israel and by others.
This
is an important notion because it entails more than just laughing at the Jews
who cannot help but continually blurt idiocies, describing what Israel has done
as being “the envy of the world,” even if it’s a shelf item such as a
desalination unit of the kind that’s produced by dozens of companies around the
world but not Israel who bought the one it has from a foreign company.
But
while this is laughable, what cannot be, is the potentially catastrophic claim
that Israel is so advanced technologically, it can solve any problem of
national security that America may encounter. This sort of claim was made and was
repeated by such charlatans as admiral James Stavridis and by such honorable
but confused individuals as General Jack Keane.
Who
knows how many people in the supply chain procuring parts for the Pentagon, expected
that when push comes to shove, they can always turn to Israel, and have their
problems solved? In fact, that’s where the world stands today with the shortage
of computer chips plaguing the world, and the Pentagon feeling the squeeze like
everyone else. Did it ask Israel for help? If it did what was the answer?
To
give you an idea as to what exists in Israel in terms of advanced technology,
you may want to read an article that came under the title: “Semiconductors and
the US-China Innovation race,” and the subtitle: “Geopolitics of the supply
chain and the central tole of Taiwan.” It was a special report originally
published in Foreign Policy on February 16, 2021.
That’s where you’ll discover who the technology players are. It is where you’ll be shocked to see that Israel isn’t even mentioned because, like the joke indicates: Going to look for technology in Israel is like going to a landfill and finding nothing but rotting garbage.