Imagine if two decades ago, someone had written an article under a title that sounded like this: “Admit it: The United States Has Already Lost in Syria.” He would have been called a heretic by some people, and pursued to be lynched. And he would have been called a sorcerer by other people, hunted down and burned alive like they did witches.
That was then. But today is different. Do you
know why, my friend? Because the United States has gone through the experience
and done worse than lose in Syria. In fact, someone has written an article under
that title, and gave it a subtitle that went like this: “From Vietnam to
Afghanistan to Iraq, Washington has repeatedly proven that nation-building is
not where its strength lies.” That someone is Professor Ali Demirdas whose
article was published on October 17, 2021 in The National Interest.
The professor first made the point that a misguided
America lost huge sums of money and numerous lives in Afghanistan to come out
of there defeated. America lost even more in Iraq, he went on to say, only to
hand the country to Iran on a “silver platter.” And he concluded that America
is now poised to replay that same history in Syria where it maintains 900
troops, apparently for the same grim purpose.
Because he sees that serving the interests of
Israel, is the only reason why America is staying in Syria, Professor Demirdas
spent the rest of the article talking about the Kurdish situation. He did so
because the Jewish dream is to establish a Kurdish nation that will stand as a
buffer between Iran and Israel. The sum total of what Demirdas has said about
this subject, is that a Kurdish nation will never happen. Period.
Ali Demirdas explained the reasons why this is
the reality on the ground with such minute details, you’ll have to be an expert
on the subject to follow the complicated narratives that tell of the broken
relations which exist between the various Kurdish tribes, as well as the
impossible relations which exist between the Kurds as a group, and the various
neighboring countries.
This done, Professor Ali Demirdas gave
America the following advice before ending the discussion:
“Instead of staying this
course and spinning its wheels in Syria, Washington would be better served by
turning its attention to more important matters. It should let regional powers
handle a problem that has never been its responsibility”.
This being a true reflection of the way that
America has been formulating its most consequential decisions since the end of
World War II, it is no wonder that riffraff of the Jewish mob of pundits see
fit to make demands on the treasonous Congress of prostitutes, commanding it to
serve the interests of Israel even when the effort comes at the expense of the
American national security as well as the welfare of the American people.
You can see an example of that in the article
that came under the title: “Democrats Can No Longer Tolerate the Squad’s
Anti-Israel Hatred,” one of the many similar articles that appear regularly in
Jewish publications as well as the liberal and conservative ones, both
considered mainstream or outlier, in the tabloid and broadsheet formats. The article
discussed here was written by James Sinkinson, and published on October 17,
2021 in the online Jewish publication, Algemeiner.
Here, in condensed form, is how Sinkinson
introduced the subject he chose to discuss:
“The former chair of the Democratic National
Committee (DNC) famously tweeted in 2018, ‘It’s Netanyahu that is the problem
for Democrats, not Israel.’ Last week, he slanderously called Israel an
apartheid state. Far more egregious are the Squad — a group of congressional
Democrats who take every opportunity to attack the Jewish state. A couple of
weeks ago, the Squad forced funding for Israel’s Iron Dome defense system out
of a bill to keep the United States government funded”.
Already here, at the start of the discussion,
you begin to sense the confused state of loyalties between America and Israel
that James Sinkinson is living. What caused him to reveal his true colors, is
the reality that the Squad has forced the establishment of a new precedent in
American political life.
It is that the Congress of the United States
will no longer rubberstamp Israel’s demands by sticking them as a rider on
important bills, and see them pass without discussion. From now on, the
tendency will be to formulate clean bills for aid to Israel that loyal American
legislators, such as members of the Squad, will want to discuss and vote up or
down, according to merit and not political prostitution.
If you believe there is enough here to
outrage you but not enough to curdle your blood, consider what happened next.
Here it is, in condensed form, from the James Sinkinson article:
“In the debate surrounding the bill, there
was a heated exchange on the House floor as a moderate Democrat from Florida
slammed a member of the Squad, who labelled Israel an apartheid state. ‘I
cannot, cannot allow one of my colleagues to stand on the floor of the House of
Representatives and label Israel an apartheid state … I reject it. I reject
that’”.
This is a member of the House that’s not
suffering from double loyalty; he is two hundred percent loyal to Israel, and
Israel only. He calls himself a moderate but the only thing that’s moderate to
non-existent about him, is his devotion to the wellbeing of the American
people. In contrast, he is ablaze with the burning desire to lie so as to protect
Israel from the reality that it is an apartheid entity pretending to be a
nation in good standing with the rest of humanity.
And while guys like him are in the Congress
working for Israel, other guys like him are in the media nudging America to
spend blood and treasure to protect Israel’s right to live a life of crimes
against humanity at perpetuity.
And this is the nexus which exits between the two kinds of guys that’s turning superpower America into lamentable America.