They never said it openly until now, but they imposed its content and its ramifications on the public for decades. It was the idea that when a Jew opened his mouth, he spoke dogma that you could oppose only at your peril … In fact, at your cancellation for all of eternity.
What happened nowadays, was that the Texas
Legislature passed a law which tells teachers they can go ahead and teach the
Holocaust, but in so doing, they must also open the door for opposing views to
be examined. And that’s when the bellies of the self-appointed leaders of Jews
cracked open, blowing their entrails as they hollered: No, no, no … what we say
about the Holocaust is dogma equal to God’s word. It cannot be questioned,
subjected to clarification or amended. It is what it is; you swallow it or you get
swallowed by the Jewish cancellation machine that has already cancelled
thousands like you.
In effect then, because the entire temple was
brought down on the head of researchers by the occupants of the echo chamber that’s
shielding the mob of Jewish pundits when they questioned (not criticized, just
questioned) a tiny aspect of a work done on the Holocaust, people stopped
questioning anything that was said, written, lectured, dramatized or filmed by
a Jew.
That approach had the effect of raising the
Jewish word, and putting it at par with God’s word. Shocked by this absurdity,
people in all walks of life around the globe came up with an answer to a
cultural disease they saw was killing the American culture, and trying to
metastasize to other cultures. What the people did in response, was tell the
Jews: You picked a god for yourselves, and we picked one for ourselves. He is
Adolph Hitler. We say that, like you, he too spoke dogma, and was right. If we
fault him for anything, it is that he died before finishing the job. Worship
your god, and we’ll worship ours.
When you come down to it, you’ll find that the
policy which the Jews had adopted, has boomeranged. But instead of changing
course to get out of its way, the Jewish leaders that already had everything
going for them, tried to exploit the return of the boomerang to get still more
than the “everything” they already had.
You become aware of this reality when you
realize that the Texas Legislation took effect on September 1, 2021, and the
Jewish leaders said nothing then. Why is that? Because they saw an opportunity
to force the education of the Holocaust on students of the state. But when the
controversy exploded in mid-October, the Jews got scared and were forced to
reveal that their word had been the dogma by which America allowed them to monopolize
the marketplace of ideas for decades.
We’re only at the start of this debate. We’ll
get into the thick of it when the pundits will jump into it and start
expressing their opinions. For now, you can get a feel of what’s to come by
reading two articles that give a background on what it’s all about. One article
came under the title: “Texas School Official Tells Teachers to Present
‘Opposing’ Views on Holocaust Material Due to State Law,” written by Dion J.
Pierre, and published on October 15, 2021 in the Jewish online publication
Algemeiner.
The other article came under the title:
“Groups express outrage over Texas educator’s suggestion for ‘opposing’ views
on Holocaust,” and the subtitle: “The Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum,
which was “appalled” by the district’s actions, placed some blame on new
legislation—new state law HB 3979.” The article was written by Faygie Holt and
published, also on October 15, 2021 in the online publication, Jewish News
Syndicate.
What you see in Dion Pierre’s article is the
executive Director of Curriculum and Instruction tell the teachers: “Make sure
that if you have a book on the Holocaust, you also have one that has other
perspectives.” At this point, someone asked: How do you oppose the Holocaust?
What this person has shown is that he or she
grew up in an era (still ongoing) in which television programs run discussions
on the Arab world with a panel that’s made entirely of Jews. It is an era in
which the Jews refer to the Arab side as the “so-called Arab side,” and tell both
the Jewish side of the story, and the Arab side … with no Arabs on the panel to
tell their own story.
That same approach has been used by the
American media to discuss the Holocaust. It was so one sided that teachers
don’t know there are ramifications to using the Holocaust as excuse to commit
crimes as horrific as the Holocaust. One crime being the stealing of a country,
the annihilation of its indigenous culture, and the massacre or dispersal of
its population … all that being financed by the American taxpayers as mandated
by legislators who grew up in a sea that’s made of that sick mentality.
As to the Faygie Holt article, it shows two
tweeted commentaries that went like this: “Why in the world are you instructing
teachers to spread lies about the Holocaust?” and “There is no ‘opposing view’
to the Holocaust”.
These being products of the culture that has
dominated North America over the last half century, you see that one commentary
considers every non-Jewish perspective on the Holocaust to be a lie. And you see
that the other commentary reduces the Holocaust to a superficial dichotomy of
being a good thing or a bad thing.
As explained earlier, this approach has turned the spoken word of the Jews into a dogma that you believe in or reject. After half a century of confusion, the people of the world rejected that dogma, and chose to worship the word of a deity they say was correct but did not finish the job he started.