Originally, the word “conspiracy” meant breathing together. That is, when in the past, there were no means of communication that allowed people to hatch a scheme while far apart from each other, they came together and literally breathed the same air in the same room while planning their secret schemes.
The discovery
and use of the electromagnetic wave changed all that because this gift to
humanity, is capable of carrying codified, written and audio-visual messages
from one place to another via several technological innovations — get
this now — at a speed that can go around the Earth more than 7 times in one
second. It is called the speed of light. For this reason, people who wish to
conspire, no longer need to come together and breathe the same air in the same
room. They only need to have access to a modern means of communication.
Whereas to
ordinary folks, conspiracy could only take place when two or more people spoke
to each other directly by telephone or via missives sent through the mail,
wartime snoops knew differently when for example, they spoke of the “fat boy”
being on his way, which meant that the atom bomb was on its way to blow up a
Japanese city, like it happened to Hiroshima. The American attackers knew what
the message meant, the Japanese defenders, who might have picked up the signal,
did not.
Several decades
of one-way communication from people that became sophisticated at manipulating
both the message that’s transmitted, and the medium that’s carrying it, has had
the effect of turning every listener into a potential unidirectional conspirator.
That is, when a pundit sets out to spread an opinion among other pundits and
among the general public, what he does is express an opinion that will be disseminated
by going from one messenger to at least two others, to twice or more as many,
to double that, and so on till it becomes the dominant opinion. It will reign
supreme till replaced by a new opinion.
Meanwhile, if
that opinion reaches those in the American Federal and State legislatures that
have the power to make things happen, yet are susceptible to being influenced
by the ideas of pundits however trivial they may be, those legislators will
take actions that might inflate an overseas terrorist entity such as Israel
while at the same time trivializing America’s democracy.
But how does it
happen that in the land of free speech, the American legislators are not able
to take advantage of what the law of the land allows them to do, which is to contrast
the Jewish message against those carrying opposite opinions, and balance
between the two? Well, this does not happen in America because the Jews
regularly pull an end run on the American law.
What the Jews have
been doing is block free speech by raising the specter of ideas which are
contrary to theirs, reaching the conclusion that discourse allowed in America about
the Jews or Israel can only be to praise them or love them lest the chain
reaction of one bad opinion engendering another, lead to the conclusion that a
good solution to the Jewish question, is a final solution. To wrap all these
ideas into one package that’s shorter than a bumper sticker thus easy to
remember, the Jews came up with the single term: “antisemitism” by which they
accuse those who refuse to love them of horrible things. They so accuse innocent
people even if the Jews are no more related to the Semitic race than Ivanka
Trump can claim to be related to Rashida Tlaib.
Five decades of
this sort of solo performance, strictly enforced by the Jews, were enough to
alert the new social media generation of Americans that something rotten has
been decomposing at the core of the Jewish control of America. That generation
has decided it must do something to change all that lest America become too
toxic to even serve as fertilizer.
So then, who is
it that’s too backward to understand any of this, or lacks the ability to know
what he’s talking about? His name is Scott A. Shay who wrote: “Why conspiracy
theorists so often aim their ire at Jews,” an article that was published on
January 20, 2022 in The New York Daily News.
Scott Shay’s
message is that observing what goes on in the world leads to the conclusion
that humanity is rife with false conspiracy theories about the Jews, thus
rejects the notion that it is the Jews who are rife with false conspiracy
theories about humanity. And this lead to an interesting question of logic:
Since the two accusations are mutually exclusive, only one is correct, and the
other is false. Which is it?
To answer that
question we look for clues in Scott Shay’s own piece of writing. What we
discover is the following:
“The latest attack on Jews in the US
was motivated by the perpetrator’s belief in conspiracy theories. The attacker
believed in the conspiracy theory that Jews control the US, and he was far from
alone. Conspiracy theories don’t require facts or evidence, just bias. Most
other recent high-profile attacks on Jews were committed by conspiracy
theorists. In all these cases, though perpetrated by attackers with very different
ideologies and backgrounds, Jews are a central focus. This common hatred has
structural similarities. Jews are fascists for the communists, communists for
the fascists, whites for the Black Israelites, fake whites for white
supremacists and on and on. This is true of educated leaders as well as
illiterate followers. The proliferation of conspiracy theories is a bad sign
for society… as is anti-Semitism, which is typically an early indication of
societal disintegration”.
If we accept the
mutually exclusive Scott Shay thesis that the whole world believes in
conspiracy theories about the Jews, we must also believe that because there are
500 non-Jews for every Jew in the world, the Jews represent the Copernicus who
was proven right whereas the throngs of religious leaders and sages were wrong.
That is, the Jews must be correct, and humanity wrong.
Yes, something
like this can happen except for one thing. For every Copernicus that came along,
there has been countless charlatans who were proven wrong. In the end, however,
humanity accepted the truth and altered its opinion about the way that the
universe unfolds.
It has been
thousands of years now, and humanity still considers Jews such as Scott Shay to
be charlatans, and there is no sign that this is going to change.