They wish to end the woke, but they don’t want to abolish the woke. What they want to do is fashion a made-to-order woke for Jews only. It will be a woke that branches out the solid trunk of victimhood.
Intent on
monopolizing the expression of pity and the monetary compensation that comes
with it, the Jews are working on a new scheme. They want the woke culture to
drop all concerns it has for the victims it helped in the past, and they want it
to concentrate on Jewish victimhood, whether there are Jewish victims or there
are none.
The Jews were given
the opportunity a few days ago to turn on the “pity us machine” which blared
the familiar refrain: “all 14 million of us around the world are hurting, and
no one cares to pity us or offer compensation. And that should cause you to pity
us, double pity us, triple pity us”.
What happened was
the occurrence of a simple hostage situation where no one was killed or injured
in a country where “normal” is the slaughter of human beings. It is a
year-round sport whose toll exceeds the killing of game during the hunting
season. But because those taken hostage were four Jews, the Jewish American
leaders wanted the seven billion people of Earth to know that all 14 million
Jews collectively felt like they were skinned alive. And yet, they heard not a
word of pity from the higher-ups who are in a position to offer compensation …
money, money, money.
Of the flood of
opinions that has already been published, and that which is yet to be
published, two articles were picked for discussion in this blog.
One article came
under the title: “Texas Synagogue Hostage Crisis: A case study in Downplaying
antisemitism,” and the subtitle: “Being cautious about assigning motive seems
to apply only to certain politically inconvenient acts.” It was written by
David Harsanyi, and published on January 17, 2022 in National Review Online.
The other article
came under the title: “Why aren’t Corporate Media Concerned About Rising
Antisemitism In The Biden Era? and the subtitle: “Is no one in the national
media concerned about the very scary brush with antisemitism that occurred on
President Biden’s watch this weekend? It was written by Eddie Scarry, and
published also on January 17, 2022 in The Federalist.
Before we get into
the Harsanyi article, let us recall something that is relevant to the topic.
When terrorists are caught in the Sinai, and asked why they go after the
Christians and their churches, the terrorists reveal that the foreigners who
train them and finance them, tell them that to get on the front page of Western
publications, they must attack high-value targets in Egypt, and there are no
higher values than the churches and those who worship in them.
It stands to
reason, therefore, to assume that this method of doing terror is a tried and
proven to work formula. It also explains why terrorists blow up mosques in
places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. This being the case, we should not see
anything unusual in terrorists attacking churches and synagogues in America.
But that’s not the impression you get when you immerse yourself in the flood of
commentaries which are put out by the Jewish “pity us machine”.
To begin with, look
what David Harsanyi wrote to start his discussion:
“Watching the
hostage situation unfold, one might have been under the impression
that an Islamist named Akram had traveled 5,000 miles and then merely
wandered into a temple in a Dallas suburb by happenstance, before taking four
hostages and allegedly demanded the release of the notorious Aafia Siddiqui,
from the nearby Carswell Air Force Base”.
This description is
a reversal of the inviolable law of causality. The situation is seen by a
mind’s eye that was so mutilated by indoctrination, it confuses the up with the
down, and confuses the right with the left. What’s obvious to a brain that has
not been mutilated by venomous indoctrination, is that Akram travelled 5000
miles to be near the Carswell Air Force Base where Aafia Siddiqui he wants to
free, is incarcerated. He looked around for a high value target in which to
stage his act, saw the synagogue, and used it to playout his act.
Now, my friend, for
David Harsanyi to suggest that of all the synagogues in the world, Akram chose
the one that was 5000 miles away, and then by a timely serendipity, discovered
that his dear Aafia was nearby. He took advantage of the luck, and pretended he
had come for her, and not for the synagogue.
That is so sick,
the man needs help. And once a scientist has developed a serum that will cure
this kind of mental disease, they should produce tons of it and cure the
millions like Harsanyi who are clearly the constituent agents that keep
plunging the only planet we have, into disarray and wars and holocausts, and
cause every misery we have grown tired of.
But what is it that
caused this diseased mind to come up with something as absurd as that, anyway?
Well, here is a quote from Harsanyi’s article that may provide clues as to the
answer:
“Akram’s presence
in a Jewish house of worship on the Sabbath was no accident. Akram allegedly
forced the rabbi of Beth Israel to call another rabbi in New York so she could
exert influence to get Siddiqui released. The belief that Jews are members of a
giant cabal that shares power over government is one of the most enduring and
popular antisemitic tropes”.
A trope is an
image with which people become associate when they repeatedly display the same
characteristics. If the display continues for a long time, it becomes a
stereotype that can no longer be said is not real. So, look at the following
quote from Eddie Scarry’s article and try to imagine someone other than a Jew coming
up with something as snobbish as this. I can tell you right now, you won’t be
able to imagine. Here is that quote:
“The number of tweets that Biden’s FBI sent out
related to a Muslim that held hostages at a synagogue: zero. The number of
tweets that Biden’s FBI sent out seeking information on men and women
photographed at the Jan. 6 Capitol riot: five. Democrats, Biden’s Justice
Department, CNN, and MSNBC have spent all month talking about the ‘anniversary’
of Jan. 6. But there’s hardly a peep about Akram, who for 11 hours had four
Jews captive at gunpoint. This is a serious episode of anti-Jewish hate”.
Eddie Scarry does not equate a hostage situation
where no one was killed or injured with an armed assault on America’s Parliament
where a number of people were killed. No, he does not do that. What he does is
rank the ordeal of 4 Jews that suffered no injury, higher than the trauma of a
nation that just escaped a planned for civil war, which the assailants had come
to start.