Saturday, February 26, 2022

Technology from thee to me but not me to thee

Are you familiar with the saying: “Cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face?” It is normally uttered to designate those who hurt themselves while trying to hurt others.

 

But things have gone so bad for America lately, you might use the saying to describe it as doing worse than take from others and never give back anything. In fact, you may describe America as cutting off its receiving hands to prevent them from giving away something.

 

As odd as it may sound, when it comes to technological innovation, this is what the Americans are doing. In fact, while acknowledging that they consider their country to be exceptional because it relies on others doing for it what it cannot do for itself, the Americans whose technological innovations are sustained by immigrants, are now lying about others stealing their technology.

 

Thus, to protect themselves from the fiction of being robbed, the Americans have announced taking measures to prevent foreign companies from having access to what they say is their technology. But in reality, these are technologies that were developed in collaboration with foreigners, people who would love to continue developing more technologies in America for Americans.

 

There was a time that we, in Canada, used to lament about the brain drain to the United States. We had good reasons to feel that way, given the ever-present American recruiters on Canadian campuses who were interviewing recent graduates and about-to-graduate students that exhibited exceptional talent in any field of technology – and offering them highly paid jobs in America.

 

Eventually, this show disappeared for two reasons. First, American companies bought most of Canada’s leading edge companies, turning them into branch-plants of companies in America. This gave the Americans access to the brightest of Canadian engineers and scientists, who were quickly transferred to the parent companies in America. Second, the Americans opened the door to students from around the world to come and study in American universities. Those who did well, were offered jobs in America, and they proved to be good at innovating and developing leading edge technologies for America.

 

Thus, for America to come now and say that it will block foreign companies, especially the Chinese, from having easy access to American technology, is to invite the Chinese to do for themselves what they have been doing for America. This will deprive America of what it acknowledges has been the source of its exceptionalism.

 

When you add to this the reality that America’s primary and secondary systems of education are so decrepit, they would be rejected by any self-respecting Third World country, you can imagine what kind of technology will be innovated in a future America; a former superpower that will be free of foreign students, and rapidly losing its exceptional status.

 

More is said about this matter in an article that came under the title: “America Is Fueling Chinese Techno-Nationalism,” and the subtitle: “The US campaign to limit Chinese firms' access to critical technologies has backfired. China has responded by pursuing its goal of bolstering its technological capabilities with an intensity unseen since Mao Zedong committed to developing nuclear weapons six decades ago.” The article was written by Keyu Jin, and published on February 25, 2022 in Project Syndicate.

 

The following is a condensed version of the way that Keyu Jin started her article:

 

“China is applying the juguo (whole nation) approach deploying massive resources to attain world-class technological prowess. China is pursuing that goal with intensity. The motivation came when under President Trump, the US launched a campaign against Chinese companies, which included restricting their access to US-controlled critical technologies like semiconductors. That campaign has continued under President Biden, and many Chinese firms face a similar fate if they are added to the so-called Entity List. These actions have amounted to a wake-up call for China. Rather than remain vulnerable to the whims of the US, it needs to become technologically self-reliant”.

 

This story played out somewhat differently in the decades of the 1950s and 1960s when the colonial powers decided to punish the former colonies that got liberated and refused to remain under the influence of their former colonial masters. To punish them, the colonial powers blockaded those countries economically and in other ways, thus forced them to rely on themselves in all sorts of ways.

 

To do that, most of the newly liberated colonies began a program of industrialization that served them well through difficult times. Today, those Asian and North African nations foremost among them China owe their industrial success to what proved to be the glory days of their punishment.

 

In fact, having successfully completed its program of industrialization, China is now in a position to repeat that same success in the hi-tech fields. And in the same way that China’s industrial success has hurt America’s industries, we should expect that China’s success in advanced technology will hurt America in this field. In that sense, by taking measures to prevent foreign companies from having access to “American” technology, the country is cutting its nose to spite its face.

 

The last word is left to Keyu Jin who stated the following:

 

“China has attracted thousands from around the world to fill research-related positions. The equivalent of billions – maybe trillions – of dollars will go toward subsidizing innovation, from supporting basic research to building science parks. China has the tools, patience, and determination to bring about long-term transformation. One thing is clear: Given the Chinese response to US pressure on its tech giants, it is safe to assume that further restrictions will only strengthen China’s determination to achieve technological self-sufficiency – and, eventually, global primacy”.