Thursday, November 10, 2022

COP27 without H is like a cake without icing

 This being the year 2022, going back 15 years takes us to the year 2007. It was September of that year when I published on this blog, an article I had previously published in English in a Montreal based Arabic Newspaper under the title: “Global Warming In Perspective,” commentaries by which I continue to stick because I believe they remain relevant today as they were at the time.

 

Two motivations convinced me to write that article. The first was generated by the confusing cacophony surrounding the science of climate change or lack of it, attributed as it was to a majority of climate scientists from around the globe. The second motivation was generated by the worst kind of intrusion into the politics of the subject. It is that, motivated by a blind hatred for the wealthy Arab countries, an army of know-nothing Jewish pundits — ranging from Steve Paikin here in Canada to Tom Friedman out there in America — were advising their respective governments on how to make cars and other products without using petroleum as raw material. Their stated intention was to destroy the Arab economies.

 

Having spent decades of my life, learning, designing, doing experiments of all kinds and then teaching them for a living, I felt qualified to design an experiment that would clear the confusion surrounding the reasons for climate change, thus determine if, as some were saying, the change was caused by human activities. Description of that experiment is part of the 2007 article. As far as I know, no one that has the means to finance doing that experiment, has taken up the idea, and so I gave up advocating it.

 

Where I stand today with regard to climate change, is where I stood then. In addition, I am more adamant today than ever before about the need to discover and/or develop all possible forms of energy because the need for them to advance human civilization, grows exponentially year after year whereas the traditional sources of energy in use today, are dwindling just as fast.

 

Waiting for the breakthrough that would deliver the icing on the cake, I followed with great interest such developments as the attempts to generate electric power using nuclear fusion, and was disappointed by the hoax that had the world believe, for a brief moment, that “Cold Fusion” had been achieved. As to the research done on fuel cells, it may have appeared like a waste of effort at the time, but looking at the matter in retrospect, it now seems that these cells have served as prototypes for the batteries which today, are used to store somewhat large quantities of solar and wind energy.

 

But the icing on the cake did not happen till Green Hydrogen appeared on the scene. But what is Green Hydrogen, anyway? It is the H in the familiar H2O, itself known as water. In fact, water can be broken into its constituents: the hydrogen and the oxygen. Hydrogen alone is a fuel that burns; oxygen alone is a catalyst that helps all kinds of fuels to burn. When 1 atom of oxygen and 2 of hydrogen fuse into a molecule by a natural (cosmic) process, they become water.

 

They can be set apart by an artificial process called electrolysis. To do this, you add a pinch of impurity into a container filled with water, and bring into it the two electrodes of an electric current. The water molecule breaks up, producing oxygen at one electrode and hydrogen at the other. Each constituent is collected separately because both are used in a variety of industries. And here is the sinch: If you do the electrolysis using electricity produced solely by green power such as wind, solar, hydro, nuclear, geothermal, wave or tidal, you would produce the celebrated Green Hydrogen.

 

Because hydrogen is a gas, it can be compressed into a liquid. Why is that important? It is important because there are two ways by which you can store electricity for future use. One way involves the storage of static electricity in a device called capacitor. These are two parallel plates separated by an insulator. The electrons (that become electricity when they move inside a closed circuit) accumulate on one plate where they remain idle till the circuit is closed. The trouble with capacitors, however, is that they can store only a limited amount of electrons, thus remain impractical for use in transportation. In fact, you would need a capacitor the size of a house to drive a car to the supermarket and return home.

 

The other way to store electricity involves the use of liquid chemicals, such as the acid based batteries, which can store relatively large amounts of electricity. However, they too are large in size but not as much as the capacitors would have to be. They are heavy in weight, however, which limits their usage in everyday practices. But enough improvements have been made to render them indispensable to a modern economy.

 

Then came Green Hydrogen, the icing on the cake. It is pure energy that needs only a cylinder in which it can be compressed. It is used as fuel in power stations to produce electricity, and is light enough to serve as substitute for gasoline in transport equipment.

 

Egypt is one of the countries that stands today at the leading edge of this new technology. Smart money from around the world are falling over each other trying to find a spot in Egypt where they can participate in this promising endeavor.

 

You would think that someone like Clifford May, who would write an article about a COP27 that is held in Egypt, would mention Green Hydrogen at least once, but he did not. I wonder why.

 

Does he hate Green Hydrogen this much? Or is it Egypt that he hates? If this is the case, he knows where to find company. There is one in Toronto and one in New York.