It has come to America that the jostling half-baked intellectuals who managed to get themselves elected to a seat of power, such as the Congress, have also managed to put themselves into positions from which they can judge the value of ideas produced by the full-blown intellectuals, and burn them when they do not conform to the ideology of the half-baked.
A short fictitious
sketch will illustrate how a real situation resembling that one, might develop.
Here it is:
JEW: You’re
threatening to annihilate me and my people.
PALESTINIAN:
You’re in the process of annihilating my people as we speak. As if this were
not enough, you’re holding a gun pointed at me.
JEW: It’s
because you threw a rock at me.
PALESTINIAN:
You shot at me to kill me but missed. Have I not the right to threaten killing
you first if someday I’ll have the means to do it?
HALF-BAKED AMERICAN:
Antisemitism! Antisemitism! Antisemitism!
What’s this
about? Well, it is that being indoctrinated with the lesson that the Jewish
cause can never be equated with that of ordinary human beings, the half baked
intellectuals of America have come to believe that half-pregnancies are
possible. When they do not find it, they imagine it, believe in it and judge
the full-blown intellectuals by it.
This is how
and why the half-backed Americans cannot see a context in which a Palestinian
who—not only sees his people being annihilated by the Jews in Gaza—is threatened
himself to be annihilated in America and the rest of Western Civilization by a
Jewish campaign that will vanish him from the face of the earth, thus make him invisible as if he were sent to hide six feet under it. This is murder by another
name.
With this
in mind my dear reader, you should now look at the article which came under title
“The lessons of Casablanca” and the subtitle: “1942 film and 1943 conference make a strong case isolationism.” It was
written by Clifford D. May and published on December 12, 2023 on The Washington
Times. Pay attention particular to the following passage:
“Roosevelt answered: Our enemies must put down their weapons, and we’ll
decide what happens after. He made clear that ‘unconditional surrender’ did not
imply the destruction of the German, Italian and Japanese peoples. But he was
intent on ‘the destruction of the philosophies in those countries which are
based on conquest and the subjugation of other people. By ‘philosophies,’ he
meant what today we call ideologies or theologies. He recognized that Nazism,
fascism and Japanese militarism were evil and needed to be discredited and
delegitimized. Why not eradicated? Because that’s not realistic, as should be
obvious now when demonstrators in cities and on campuses are calling for the
genocide of Israelis — a neo-Nazi ‘final solution’ to the ‘Jewish question’ in
the Middle East”.
The
reference here is to the Palestinian call for a Palestine that will be free from
the River to the Sea. When seeing the signs that display this slogan, the Jews paint
a context in which Palestine will be cleansed of its current population — that which,
in their view, will be replaced by Palestinians.
By
contrast, the context that’s painted by the Palestinians today is aligned almost
perfectly with the one that Roosevelt painted decades ago. They too envisage, not the destruction
of the Jews, but the destruction of the philosophies in Israel and America
which are based on conquest and the subjugation of other people. By philosophies,
they mean the ideologies that power the Zionist thinking. And like Roosevelt
who recognized that Nazism, fascism and Japanese militarism were evil and
needed to be discredited and delegitimized, the Palestinians have recognized that
Zionism is evil and needs to be discredited and delegitimized, and driven out
of Palestine. This is what’s meant by “Palestine will be free from the River to
the Sea”.
If at all possible what the world needs now is a massive campaign to save the Jews from themselves. While everyone should strive to participate, the American President must do more than just talk to the Jews about what’s right and what’s not. He must warn them of the consequences if and when they do the wrong things. And he must carry the threat to show them how serious he is.