Sunday, December 3, 2023

What’s tolerated in law, how they circumvent it

 Time after time, women that were severely mistreated by their husbands or boyfriends for a long time, took matters in their own hands and retaliated against their brutalisers, at times violently. If the judges looking into such cases would rule strictly in accordance with the provisions of the law, the women would be punished a second time.

 

For this reason, the law grants the judges the discretion to take into account circumstances such as compulsion, and where applicable mitigation. What this means is that the judges are allowed to superimpose their humanity over the abstract expression of the law, thus attenuate as they see fit, the punishment they might hand down to such women.

 

Such cases are visible and often talked about because the brutalizers are usually strong men, and those brutalized usually weak women. But there are exceptions during which time strong individuals brutalize weaker individuals of any sex, be they young or old. And there are institutions, including militaries, that brutalize weaker societies, be they neighbors or distant nations. What happens there?

 

Well, we know what happened in the case of the people of Palestine who were incessantly brutalized by their Jewish occupiers who posed as government security officers and settlers for several decades both in the West Band and in blockaded Gaza. In the face of a world that kept mum about their plight, the Palestinians rose in anger, took matters in their own hands, and retaliated against their Jewish brutalizers on October 7, 2023.

 

Whereas the billions of ordinary human beings populating Planet Earth, superimposed their humanity on the weak actors, thus appreciated the compulsion that drove the Palestinians to act as they did, and descended in the streets of towns and villages to express their solidarity with the battered people of Palestine — the elites that can be bribed and/or blackmailed in a handful of so-called Liberal Democratic countries, cloistered themselves in the echo chamber of infamy, and wailed what the Jews have been stuffing in their mouths.

 

Seeing that they were getting nowhere with their little trick, Jewish Central instructed the Judeo-American propaganda machine to come up with something that would have a better chance at winning ordinary people to their side. And so, the brains of the machines huddled together, thought hard and came up with an answer. They said: let’s give us the role of the battered woman or worse.

 

Because nothing can be worse than raping a women, the Jews tried to work up a story that would have Hamas rape Israeli women. But because this did not happen, and they will have a devil of a time faking cases that prove it did, they pulled the most cowardly trick they ever invented for the purpose of slandering the innocent. That cowardly trick goes like this:

 

Instead of accusing someone of a crime, and open themselves to being sued for slander, the Jews would call for an investigation into something they know will reveal nothing. But that’s okay with them because the main thing is that they would have associated the innocent with a horrible crime, knowing that even a complete exoneration of the innocent, will not erase the damage they caused when they uttered the false accusation.

 

This is what the Jews are doing now. It is a continuation of the trend that has been with them for centuries. But like always, they may score a few immediate winnings, but they will lose in the end when their past will catch up with them as it always did.