Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Hideous Hand Of Horror And Hoaxes


On July 20, 2012, the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, published an article in the Wall Street Journal under the title: “Taking the Cyberattack Threat Seriously” and the subtitle: “In a future conflict, an adversary unable to match our military supremacy on the battlefield might seek to exploit our computer vulnerabilities here at home.” In fact, this subtitle is only part of a paragraph you encounter in the article which goes on to say this: “Taking down vital banking systems could trigger a financial crisis. The lack of clean water or functioning hospitals could spark a public health emergency … the loss of electricity can bring businesses, cities and entire regions to a standstill.”

Given that America knows of the consequences of a cyberattack, and given that it worries about it to this extent, you ask the question: Why is it that America has launched the first ever cyberattack on Iran thus risk retaliation if not invite one? Well, in trying to answer the question, we first note that the attack was coordinated with Israel, and this immediately suggests the answer: America did what it did because it was not itself. In fact, America was possessed by what you might call the evil spirit of Israel which is the Jewish lobby in America. This is the problem, therefore -- it is that America is possessed by the Jewish lobby in the same way that some people believe a human body in need of exorcism can be possessed by the devil.

If so, what is this thing they call Jewish lobby and what does it want? Well, before we get to talk about the lobby, we need to know something about human nature. The reality is that human cultures are full of examples about individuals who warn of a danger that does not exist, thus bring about consequences that can be serious. There is, for example, the story of the kid who repeatedly cried wolf when there was no wolf around. And so, the never ending cries of the kid resulted in that the adults around him ceased to believe him. But then one day, a real wolf appeared on the scene, the kid cried wolf and nobody came to his rescue.

There is also the story of the hypochondriac who continually complained about a pain that turned out to have no underlying causes. Eventually, the man got so tired of his own complaints, he convinced himself that every pain he felt was psychosomatic in nature and dismissed it offhand. Then one day, he had a real heart attack that could have been treated but he neglected to call for help and thus died alone.

Last but not least, there is the story of the paranoid who believed he was targeted and pursued by all sorts of enemies who sought to harm him for no reason except that he is who he is. The suspicious mind of this character made life so miserable for the people around him, no one who came close to him wanted to remain in his vicinity for longer than it was absolutely necessary. That situation caused the character to live like a hermit with no one to fear but his shadow and his own reflection in the mirror.

Other examples abound concerning people whose specialty is to trade in fear. These would be the pastors and the gurus who keep predicting the end of the world even after they are proven wrong. And there are the professional alarmists who predict the return of the Ice Age then reverse themselves and predict the return of Global Warming. There are also the people whose expertise lies in predicting the crash of the stock markets, the collapse of the world economies or the disaster that computers will cause when they go crazy such as the time when these experts warned of the Y2K calamity that never came.

When we look closely at these cases, we find that the people involved in them are of the type that hungers for attention and cannot live without being under the gaze of someone. These individuals will do anything and everything they can to attract attention to themselves. Once they have it, they hold on to it so tightly, they render the people around them tired and disgusted to the point of avoiding them whenever they can. And while this is true of individuals, it can also happen that a group of people would develop a culture that forever seeks to attract attention to the group for whatever reason. A notorious example of this kind is the group calling itself Jewish; a name it has attributed to itself even though it has nothing in common with the ancient Hebrews who used to adhere to a religion by that name.

And so, generally speaking, the habit of seeking attention and the habit of spreading fear to draw attention can be viewed as being part of human nature. Thus, they can be seen to live at the core of what motivates the modern Jewish lobby in America, but it must also be said that they are not the only motivations at work here. Something else is there which makes the spirit of the lobby want to possess America the way that the devil possesses a human body and holds on to it as tightly as a parasite holds on to its host.

Here is one plausible explanation. For nearly two thousand years, the leaders (rabbis and otherwise) among these people made life miserable for their followers and for everyone that came into contact with them. They did so not only because they devised a culture combining the vice of the kid who cried wolf and the vice of the hypochondriac who suffered from pains that did not exist, but also because they added something more serious to the mix. What they did was add schizophrenia to the paranoia of imagining enemies that did not exist. And this was the demonic combination they injected into the minds, the hearts and the souls of their followers.

The combination has allowed the Jewish leaders to accomplish two things at the same time. It has allowed them to isolate the followers as if they lived inside the walls of a ghetto -- whether or not an actual physical wall separated the latter from the outside world -- and has allowed the leaders to rule with absolute authority. This last part is necessary to have because a period of indoctrination follows the period of isolation. And the parts that make up the syllabus of indoctrination are so contradictory, they must be force fed to the students like dogmas that cannot be challenged or they will be rejected by a healthy and ordinary mind.

The Jewish method of recruiting new followers and of securing their ironclad allegiance made it possible for the leaders to assemble armies of foot soldiers who would pay any personal price to serve the cause. A stark example of a foot soldier who grew up to become a leader then started to work at recruiting new foot soldiers for the cause can be seen in the article that was written by Jonah Goldberg and published in the National Review Online on July 13, 2012. It is titled: “Tilting at the U.N. Windmill” and has the subtitle: “Not everything the U.N. does is evil. Some of it is just incompetent.” Goldberg himself is the example.

You see in the first sentence of the article how he accomplishes three objectives. First, he sets himself and the potential new recruits apart from the rest of creation. Second, he stakes the United States as if it were already a ghetto without walls. Third, he sets the whole concoction as being above everyone else. Here is that sentence: “Those of us who believe the United States would be best served by pulling out of the United Nations and starting up a more morally and politically serious clubhouse for morally and politically serious nations are often accused of tilting at windmills.”

This done, he tells the potential recruits why they must set themselves apart from the rest of creation. He tells them in a roundabout way there are enemies out there they must fear and must resolve to fight. This is how he puts it: “The phrase 'tilting at windmills' … means to fight … 'Tilting is a jousting expression, in case you didn't know.'” He then goes on to tell them why they must be paranoid about the world around them. He starts the discussion like this: “let's review some recent evidence.” He does that with a laundry list of complaints but of course, he must also quote an authority or two on the subject. Who does he choose to quote? You guessed it; he chooses two very Jewish names, Steven Mosher and Gordon Crovitz.

Another example to look at is that of John Bolton. It comes in an article written by him and published on July 17, 2012 in the Wall Street Journal. It has the title: “What America Gets for Its U.N. Blank Check” and the subtitle: “Bureaucrats give 'technical assistance' to Iran and North Korea.” Not to forget is the fact that Bolton used to be the US ambassador to the UN; the one who suggested that the top ten floors of the UN building in New York should be blown up or something to this effect. And of course, his article is an attack on that world body.

Like Goldberg, he picks an authority upon whom to rest his presentation. Who would that be? It is none other than the notorious Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. This is a woman who suffers from a feeling of guilt that runs so thickly in her veins; a woman who suffers from a fanaticism that runs so deeply in her bloodstream, it is said that a drop of her blood spilled in the oceans of the world would contaminate them so badly, all life forms in them would perish instantly. And the Jewish lobby is using her to the hilt so as to put America's power and wealth in the service of Israel and all the Jewish causes.

The wave that was stirred up by the Jewish lobby having the aim to pull America away from the United Nations, Bolton does his part in the article by attacking one of its agencies. He begins the article like this: “Leave it to a small, little-known agency to prove just how out of control the United Nations can get.” He goes on to tell the story of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) which delivered computer hardware to Iran and North Korea so as to beef up their patent offices thus improve their capabilities at catching potential offenders.

But is this why he and Ros-Lehtinen say the UN is out of control? Is this why they want to stop or reduce American funding to the world body if not pull out of it entirely? No, there is worse than that, they say. What is worse than that? you ask. And Bolton writes this: “Consider the audacity of Iran and North Korea, taking candy from babes.” Wow! They are taking candy from babes? How is that? you ask. Well, mm ... what was the question again? Oh yeah, I remember now, it's that candy from babes thing. Well, let me put it this way, says Bolton: “By evading sanctions within the U.N. temple itself, these nuclear proliferators show how to defeat … sanctions … through death by a thousand cuts.”

Hmm. Do you mean to say there is no more candy at the UN temple because somebody died by a thousand cuts? What exactly are you saying John Bolton? What exactly are you saying Ileana Ros-Lehtinen? Until you answer these questions let me tell you something because I do have something serious to say to you both. It is the following:

Computers used in a patent office are not of dual use. This is a sickly hoax put out by people like you, and the whole world knows it. These computers are ordinary machines that can be bought at any store in the developed world or the developing ones. Furthermore, America does not have a monopoly on advanced computer technology. Iran and North Korea certainly have computers for their space and nuclear programs which are a thousand times more sophisticated than the ones used in the patent office.

If you John Bolton, if you Jonah Goldberg as well as the countless other Jews who write about this subject want America to pull out of the UN, come right out and say so honestly. It is tiresome to see you try to cut the bond between them a thousand cuts like a toothless babe that is trying to chew on a piece of hard candy. In fact, what should happen now is for America to cut its ties with Israel, not cut it with the United Nations or anyone else in the world.

The time has come for all the relationships to mature and take on a normal allure. More importantly, it is time for Uncle Sam to end the habit of castrating himself by cutting his manhood into a thousand little pieces just to make Israel look more potent than it is.

It has not worked in the past and will never work in the future.