It was brought to my attention that the New York/Tel Aviv
axis of disinformation which I discussed in my previous article – the one
published below under the title: “Inside The Kingdom of Ignorant
Disinformation” – has struck again. It is that the demonic axis has convinced
the CNBC network to republish on its website the article that was written by
David Kirkpatrick and was published in the New York Times on March 31, 2013
under the title: “Short of Money, Egypt Sees Crisis on Fuel and Food.”
Not only that, but the axis has also convinced CNBC to
peddle the article around the world so as to hurt Egypt to the maximum extent. Now
you know why humanity considers Judaism to be not the religion it claims to be
but a kind of cultural flesh eating disease disguised as a religion. The thing
has already eaten the New York Times; it is now in the process of gnawing at
CNBC, and all the unguarded publications that are expected to fall into the
satanic trap of the demonic axis.
In my previous article I described the axis as being a
kingdom of ignorance harboring the “Hate Egypt ” propaganda machine. And I
ended the presentation this way: “There is so much more to say in this regard, and I am certain I'll
be saying them in the future because the jackasses abound out there, and they
will provoke me enough to say them.” Little did I know I shall be provoked only
a few hours later.
If there is an
editor out there who has pride in his or her profession, and wants to avoid
being viewed as a hopeless jackass, let me tell you something you could use to
protect yourself. It is a lesson on how the agents of the axis manage to pull
off the sort of tricks that can make people like you look bad. What I have is a
true story that was taken from real life.
It was 5 years ago
or thereabout that Egypt
was consuming 12 million tons of wheat; producing 6 million tons locally and
importing 6 million tons. From here came the idea that Egypt was
importing half of its consumption in wheat. The population of the country has
been growing ever since, and so did its consumption of wheat. The thing,
however, is that the local production of wheat has grown even faster. This
means that the country is expected to consume 14 million tons next year, having
produced 9.5 million last year, and expected to produce 10.5 million this year
if the weather will cooperate. And this would represent 75 percent of
consumption.
But while the
evolution was unfolding during 5 years, the “Hate Egypt ”
machine was maintaining that Egypt
imported half its wheat consumption. Look now what effect this has had on
people like someone who could be on your team now or might be on it in the
future. It happened that at some point, Egypt produced 9 million tons of
wheat. You know what happened then? It happened that someone who was fixated on
the idea that Egypt produced
only half its consumption made up a story to the effect that Egypt was
consuming 18 million tons of wheat. That's because 9 is half of 18, you see!
And everyone after that based the stories they told on this fallacy.
You want to know why
David Kirkpatrick came to say that Egypt imported 75 percent of its
wheat? It happened because Egypt
plants wheat twice a year – the Spring crop and the late Summer crop. Years ago
before deregulation, the government bought all the wheat both times and
disposed of it to the subsidized and non-subsidized bakeries. Since
deregulation, however, the farmers have been selling as much as they can
themselves, and selling the remainder to the government.
The latter then
turns around and sells what it gets to the subsidized bakeries. It happened
this time that the government contracted to buy about 4.5 million tons of the
upcoming crop. Since this represents 25 percent of the fictitious 18 million
tons stuck in the mind of people, Kirkpatrick calculated that Egypt was
importing 75 percent of its wheat.
And because the
imported wheat is subsidized by the foreign governments from where it is
imported – therefore too cheap for the Egyptian farmers to compete against –
the Egyptian government has been paying the Egyptian farmers a higher price
than the imports. Thus, if the Egyptian wheat is not in fact superior in
quality to the imports, the fact that the farmers are getting more for it than
the imports should make it look superior.
But do you think
Kirkpatrick was going to say so? Of course not; he would be fired from his job
if he did. So he turned the thing upside down and said that the Egyptian
government was mixing the low quality Egyptian wheat with the high quality
imports to improve the subsidized bread. Ah! That flesh eating disease.
Like my Jewish
friend would say: Light up the oven.