Let me begin this discussion by setting up a fictitious
scene. A group of well armed bank robbers rob a bank and don't run away.
Instead, they call the police and complain that the staff and customers at the
bank are harassing them. They also complain that these people are getting in
their way as they try to carry on with the caper they came to pull off.
What do you think the police ought to do in such a
circumstance? Well, that question was put to George W. Bush (also known as the
W) with regard to a similar situation unfolding in Palestine where the well armed Jewish hordes
are robbing the Palestinians at gunpoint. Not surprisingly, the answer of the
former American president reflected the fact that the level of his IQ hovers
somewhere between the imbecile and the moron.
This has come to the fore because we live at a time when the
things that used to destroy a man's life or that of a woman are now done in the
open. More than that; the people who do such things brag about what they do –
even get paid for doing it. The truth is that people were labeled antisemitic
for saying that the Jews were responsible for any of the wars that have erupted
in the past, or those that continue to erupt today.
The people who said so at the time were destroyed
professionally, financially and socially. It may still happen today unless you
are a Jew, and you argue Israel 's
right to murder and rob the Palestinians, then call on America to come
and help. That is, America
is asked to help even if it must get into a never ending series of wars against
anyone and everyone who would side with the Palestinians, and help free them of
the occupation.
Made to believe that the Palestinians are all Islamic
Jihadists, and promised that his legacy in the history books will shine
brighter if he saved humanity from them, the W gave the Israelis everything
they asked for to allow them to complete the caper they started. It was as if
the police had given the bank robbers more and better guns to subdue, and if necessary,
kill the staff and the customers at the bank.
But when confronted with the reality that the elected Jewish
leaders in Israel and the self appointed Jewish leaders in America only wanted
to maintain the policies that dragged America into needless wars; and wanted to
maintain the policies that destroyed America's standing in the world, the W
said it was fine with him because he had the sacred duty to go after the
Jihadists no matter the cost. He could not have displayed his moronic level
more starkly than that.
The W might also have been made to believe that the leaders
in Israel
had the support of their people with regard to maintaining the occupation and
expanding it with more Jewish settlements. And he might have been made to
believe that the self appointed leaders of the Jews in America had the
support of the Jewish population. But the reality turned out to be very
different from that. In fact, the last election in America
and the one in Israel
proved that the policy of occupation and expanded settlements has no support in
either place.
More than that, the American election has shown that the
much vaunted Jewish and Evangelical votes are not to be feared. Indeed, the
Jews voted for President Obama overwhelmingly despite the fact that the Jewish
press – chief among them the Fox News network – vilified him in a way that was
never seen since the Nazi propaganda machine used to portray the Jews as rats
foraging in garbage dumps. As to the Evangelicals; they did not show up at the
poles to vote for the challenger, Mitt Romney, despite the incessant calls that
came from the foxy bullhorn of the Murdoch propaganda machine.
Thus, the promise made to Mr. Obama to the effect that his
party could only win the mid-term election in 2014 if he courted the Jews and
the Evangelicals, is a false promise. This point out of the way, there remains
two other points advanced by World Jewry that need to be debunked. First, they
say that Israel
is facing an existential threat. Second, they say that things are happening in
the Middle East which render this moment not a
propitious one for a peace settlement. Because of this, goes the argument, America must continue to support Israel at any
cost lest it be annihilated.
Well, the first point is contradicted by the argument they
make themselves to the effect that Israel feels so secure and so
comfortable, it has no incentive to talk peace. With this, they mean to send a
strong signal to the effect that if the Palestinians want peace, then someone –
perhaps America ,
the oil rich Arab states or both – should make a big financial offer to whet
the Jewish appetite for a peace settlement. It is money, money, money.
As to the second point, the fact remains that the events in Middle East are unfolding as they should. What is
happening there at this time is the unwinding of the situations that were
created by the Sykes-Picot Agreement at the start of the Twentieth Century.
Such unwinding happened on the Indian sub-continent, in Southern Africa, the
Balkans, the Falkland Islands and may happen
in a few other places too. There is nothing odd about any of this, but what is
odd is what is happening inside Israel
where the internal problems make apartheid Rhodesia
and apartheid South Africa
look like a game children play.
So then, what should we expect to see in the near future?
Well, President Obama has an IQ that made him see the wisdom in winding down
the two wars that the W started at the behest of the Jews. Will he now see that
the best way to deal with these people is to say to them they will get nothing
from America till they end
the occupation of Palestine ?
And if the sick dogs in the Congress start making noise – as
they surely will – he should run not to the Israeli public and ask it to side
with him; he should run to the American public and tell it to tell the Congress
that enough is enough.