Thursday, February 20, 2014

Watch for the Cogs that Were Set in Motion

When Netanyahu told his people not to worry because he and his group know how to deal with the Americans, he was not kidding because the truth be told, the group he was talking about has a strategy that was put together a long time ago, and is passed on from generation to generation at which time it is modified to better handle the circumstances that keep evolving.

The way the strategy stands at this point in time is specifically tailored to deal with America given that this is the place from where Israel gets what is necessary to live on. It is also the place from where Israel gets what else it needs to maintain the belligerent attitude toward its neighbors, a trait that culture and religion obligate every Jew and Jewish group to live by. Thus, the way to deal with America comes out of Tel Aviv in the form of directives on a daily basis, and sent to all the cogs in the vast Jewish propaganda machine that spans the globe, but having a heavier than usual presence in America.

One important cog in the Jewish propaganda machine is Thomas L. Friedman whose cover is to write a column for the New York Times. This job is convenient for him because, unlike the cogs of a lower grade, he has access to the public whenever he wants to, and not only when someone is good enough to invite him on their show. You can tell what the latest directive from Tel Aviv has been from the response that Friedman is displaying, which happens to be the same response that other cogs have been displaying lately.

Believing that the way to deal with America is to be like a tree that bends with the wind, Netanyahu's group ordered all the cogs out there to be flexible when called upon to display the tendency. Sensing that Washington is serious about working out a deal that will end the Jewish occupation of Palestine, the Netanyahu group has told the cogs to be conciliatory toward its neighbors at this time. And this is what you see Tom Friedman do in his latest column: “Breakfast Before the MOOC” that was published in the New York Times on February 19, 2014.

Under the guise of telling a personal story about Prof. Hossam Haick – what he calls an Israeli Arab – which means a non-Jewish Palestinian living under occupation and forced to take up Israeli citizenship, Tom Friedman complies with the directive of being conciliatory toward the neighbors of Israel by amplifying the two main ingredients of the new propaganda trends. They come down to the following: Show the Arabs to be hungry for the goods things that Israel has which they don't have such as knowledge, and show Israel as willing to give the Arabs what they want but are not willing to take from the hand of a Jew.

The trouble for Friedman was that by the time he came close to the end of the article, he realized this was not going to fly. It used to be easy in the old days to say Israel was heavenly, the Arab countries were hellish, and if the Arabs behaved well, the Israelis may throw a few things in their direction that will make them happy. And Friedman would know that enough Americans will buy this crap. But this is not the case anymore because enough truth has filtered through the demonic censoring apparatus that was erected around America by the same people who run the Jewish propaganda machine. And now that enough people question what the likes of Friedman is telling them, he found it necessary to acknowledge this reality.

This is how he put it: “I know what some readers are thinking: nice bit of Israeli propaganda...” But that does not mean he can forget about his mission which is to go on saying this: “Israel is a country [that also] has its highs, like providing a tool for those in the Arabic-speaking world eager to grasp the new technologies reshaping the global economy.” What Friedman and those like him fail to grasp is that the readers are telling them to cut on the propaganda they do for Israel because they know what is going on in the Arab world. This is a world that is full of great universities teaching all sorts of courses including nanotechnology. They don't need Israel for that because Israel does not have a fraction of what they have.

Their students participate in worldwide competitions for best design or best built one thing or another, and they often win first or second prize. And you know something, my friend, whether held in America, Europe, South America or Asia, not once in all the time that I have followed these competitions did I see the name of an Israeli mentioned. Such names only appear in the Thomas L. Friedman columns on the pages of the New York Times.

What a shame that such heavenly minds should stay home when the time comes to compare themselves against those they want the American public to believe are inferior to them.