Those who are old enough to remember the bad old days when
the Jewish propaganda machine in North America relied heavily on superstition
to impress the public and make the Jews look like a breed apart – will not be
surprised to see what Tom Friedman has imported from Israel . He talks about it in an
article titled: “ISIS and SISI,” published on June 25, 2014 in the New York
Times.
The fashion in those days was to base the analysis of
current events, and the predictions of what will happen in the future on
numerology; on astrological phenomena such as the apparition of comets, and on
the coincidence of events such as something happening today that is the
anniversary of something that happened long ago. When the Jews were heavily
criticized for operating by this mentality, they quieted down in North America
but apparently not in Israel
where they still pursue a line of behavior that is even more bizarre.
Friedman tells that an Israeli analyst (influential enough
to be written about in the New York Times) is basing his analysis of the past,
and his predictions for the future on the coincidence of a falsified English
acronym that is the mirror image of a falsified Egyptian proper name. The two
words are ISIS and SISI. The first stands for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria according to the Israeli
analyst. But the truth is that the acronym should read ISIL because those who
came up with the idea of that state had the entire Levant in mind and not just Syria . As to
SISI, the actual name in Arabic is Elsisi whereas the truncated word Sisi does
not exist.
Armed with the two made-up words, the influential Israeli
analyst did what every self-described Jewish historian (more like mutilator of
history) has done before him. He created an entirely false narrative to
encompass the fabricated coincidence of a falsified name and a falsified
acronym that have nothing in common between them. This done, he built around
the double falsifications a vision as to what the future holds; a vision he
sold to Tom Friedman and the eventual suckers of the New York Times who will
take him serious.
But the reality is that history is not a game of words that
can be played like a crossword puzzle. It cannot be tackled by a superficial
mind either because historical events are made of several layers of
undercurrents that act on each other simultaneously, and affect the course of
one another continually. Thus, a prerequisite to becoming a historian is to be
endowed with the ability to see things in depth, discern the layers of
undercurrents, and find out how they act on each other. For this reason, it is
doubtful that even an intelligent kid raised in the Jewish culture can grow up
and become a good historian because Judaism is based on dogma that forbids inquiry
outside the established line of thought.
And so, when you have a Middle East that is made of 23 Arab
speaking countries: (5 North African, 6 in the sub-Sahara/Indian Ocean, 7 on
the Arabian Peninsula/Persian Gulf, 5 in the Levant,) and when you have several
other countries associated with the Arabs in culture and religion – all of whom
have layers of separate and intertwined histories that go as far back as 7,500
years, you have depth that cannot be explained with the ISIS-SISI model even if
the made-up acronym and the fake name had not been fabricated for the occasion.
Indeed, what history will remember about our era is that Egypt stood at the North Eastern corner of
Africa like the colossus that protected both the North African and the
sub-Saharan/Indian Ocean countries from too much foreign interference, while Saudi Arabia
stood like the colossus that protected the Arabian Peninsula/Persian Gulf
countries from too much foreign interference.
And this is why those countries survived almost intact at a
time when the Levant was being dismembered by
a century of outside interference. That interference first came about when the
colonial powers acted to further their own interests; then came about again
when Jewish America played an international role driven by the likes of
Friedman and those in Israel who fed him superstitious beliefs. But the real
purpose of that role is so incoherent; it shall remain a puzzle till the end of
time.