The Americans seem to get filled with pride every time they
think there is a problem in the world that only they can solve. This is a
misconception that gets amplified by non-Americans who invite the Americans to
solve a festering problem. But what these people also know which they don't say
aloud is that only America
is capable of solving the problem because it was America that created it in the
first place.
The most glaring example of this sort of situation is what
is happening in the Middle East today. The
reality is that if someone can solve that problem, it would be the Americans
because it was they who created it in the first place. Not only that, but they
kept feeding it to the point that even they may no longer be in a position to
solve it. The situation has been likened to someone raising a dog without
house-training it; and now that the dog is crapping all over the place, the
owner can neither house-train it nor keep it out of the neighbor's houses.
Now that the Levant portion of the Middle East is in
turmoil, the Americans look at themselves and say with pride: “Only America Can
Prevent a Disaster in Iraq,” which is what Paul Bremer – who was for a time
America's envoy to Iraq – says in an article that also came under the subtitle:
“Without U.S. help, the civil war may spiral into a regional conflict as other
countries, including Iran, intervene.” It was published on June 16, 2014 in the
Wall Street Journal (WSJ).
This article says more between the lines than Bremer's
deliberate lines are actually saying. It is that Bremer “wrote in these pages
[WSJ] in December 2011 after the last of our military left Iraq ...” What
did he write? He wrote this: “President Obama made a serious mistake.” Where is
the proof of that? It is that “the withdrawal of all American forces has now
had its predictable results.” This is what Bremer meant to communicate about Iraq . But the
message that comes out from between the lines is that the dog may have been on
a leash, but it was the master that was kept under the control of the dog. And
this is what has been happening for decades in the relationship between America and Israel .
Bremer admits: “America
lost considerable influence over political events in Iraq .” Why is that? Because
“removing Saddam Hussein upended a thousand years of Sunni domination in the
lands of Mesopotamia . It takes a long time for
stability to return.” So he asks the question: “What is to be done?” And he
explains: “America 's core
interest remains a stable and united Iraq . But regional interests are
broader. At stake is the political structure of the entire region, with huge
consequences for our friends and allies there.”
But who are these friends and allies? Well, one of them –
the one they say is the strongest of America's allies – is none other than
Israel; the very dog that went crapping all over the neighborhood, being
overfed and over-spoiled by the master it is itself controlling. The Jewish
lobby in America
and the pundits who have taken over the septic tanks masquerading as think
tanks never made secret of their desire to destabilize the countries in the
region. They began the chain of events that led to the current situation when a
Jew stole the kind of military secrets in America
that allowed Israel to bomb
a civilian nuclear power station in Iraq . This was the event that
unleashed the dogs of war, and led to the current situation where America finds
itself up to its eyeballs in a pool of Jewish crap. Call it kosher but it
stinks no less.
Is Paul Bremer addressing this point at all? Is he even
hinting at it? Yes he is. But in an article that is 900 words long, look how
much he devotes to that point: “Those Americans who have pressed in the past
for dividing Iraq should be careful: They might get what they wished for.”
These are only 21 words out of 900 when the entire article should have been
about the point. And instead of saying “Those Americans” he should have had the
guts to say those Jews because, in fact, those Jews consider themselves to be
more Israeli than American.
And when it comes to intestinal fortitude, some people are
halfway there, having developed the courage to say “neocons” to mean Jews
because the neocon movement (which means new conservative) was founded by the
Jewish liberals who turned coat and became conservatives.