You may at one time or another had a friend that loathed his
or her boss so much, they spoke of him with hate whether he did something or
did its opposite. For example, he was an SOB because he gave his employees time
off to compensate for overtime worked instead of paying them. And he was an SOB
because he paid them instead of giving them time off.
And you may have had a friend that loved his or her boss so
much, they spoke of her lovingly whether she did something or did its opposite.
For example, she was sweet because she gave her employees time off to
compensate for overtime worked instead of paying them. And she was sweet
because she paid them instead of giving them time off.
This is the sort of thing you encounter in real life. Most
of the time, however, you do not react to it as much as you did when reading
about it in two short paragraphs. That's because this form of writing has the
effect of time lapse photography where the events of a full day are shown to
unfold in a few seconds. What is shocking is not only that such people exist
but that they are not crazy for doing what they do. Whether it happened
instinctively or by meticulous design, these people have discovered that
behaving in this manner allows them to control those who listen to them.
And if that's not shocking enough, let it be known that a
great deal of this sort of behavior goes on at levels considered to be higher
than the mundane. Yes, it happens at the level of local politics, and it happens
at the level of international politics. The people who made it an indispensable
ingredient in their relationships with others are the Jewish organizations who
gained fame by calling antisemitic those who say Jewish lobby instead of
Israeli lobby. And by calling antisemitic those who say Israeli lobby instead
of Jewish lobby. Using this trick or a variation of it has allowed them to take
effective control of America
in about half a century.
But you don't have to be a Jewish organization to play the
game. You may be a lone Jew having a background in psychiatry, and turn
yourself into a one-man performer dedicated to serve the Jewish agenda. This is
what Charles Krauthammer has done, and you can see his latest performance in an
article that came under the title: “Barack Obama, Bewildered Bystander” and the
subtitle: “He's angry, but not angry enough to fix what's wrong.” It was
published on October 23, 2014 in National Review Online.
The apparent dichotomy concerning him this time is that of a
President of the Republic that may be calm and running the affairs of the
nation by cerebral force and a cool hand, or he may be an emotional being that
is guided by instinct, responding by knee-jerk reflexes to every incident that
comes to his attention. The fact is that most Presidents combine the two
characteristics in them, with a bias towards one side or the other. Barack
Obama happens to be biased towards the cool hand type … but someone that will
show emotions when the situation is extreme enough.
And the game that a Krauthammer will play under the
circumstances is to accuse the President of ineptitude for being cerebral
instead of being emotional. And to accuse the President of ineptitude for being
emotional instead of being cerebral. This is what the author does in the first
part of the article. But being the Jew that he is, he tries to have it both
ways, and thus demolishes his own theory by the time he gets to the second part
of his article.
He does that by trying to call the President a bewildered
bystander that is so incompetent he does not know what he is doing. And he does
it by calling the President a manipulator who knows exactly what he wants –
which is big government – and goes about realizing his plan by employing shrewd
methodical steps while displaying “calculated outrage” when he must, so as to
reassure the public that he is human after all.