The editors of the Washington Post dished out yet another
attack on Egypt .
This was expected because it is known that instructions to do so come to them –
steady stream – from occupied Tel Aviv. They published the piece in the Post
under the title: “Stop U.S.
support for the repressive regime in Egypt ” on October 28, 2014. It is
poor in content but it stinks mightily anyway. Analyzing it requires the
reviewer to treat it like mental poop from the intellectually anorexic. It is
not a nice thing to work on but it is a job that must be done.
Because the editorial will have no effect on the positions
it is discussing, it will be better not to waste time or energy analyzing it
from this angle. In fact, you encounter something more important that is crying
out for attention when you get to the end of the article … and this is where
time and energy must be spent. The point that the editors make is this: “the
administration should be defending what remains of Egypt 's democratic opposition and
civil society from Mr. Sissi.”
And this prompts you to ask: Do these people have the mental
capacity to see that when they do something to someone, this someone and
everyone else will be tempted to do the same thing to them? Could they not see
that in doing so, they would be legalizing the illicit? Can they not understand
that when they teamed up with Israel
to try and sabotage the Iranian nuclear facilities, they ushered the new age of
open season for the practice of cyber warfare? Are they so enamored with every
Jewish peculiarity, they will advocate the destruction of Civilization to
please the Jews?
Have these people not come to grips with the reality that a
group of nobodies in the Third World equipped with a device of social media can
establish contact with what “remains” of America 's democratic or
undemocratic opposition, as well as with its civil or uncivil society, and
“defend” them? And what would it mean to defend characters such as these? Think
of the possibilities, editors of the Washington
post, and don't you dare come cry foul on my shoulder because my reaction will
not be to comfort you.
When America
scored big victories during the Second World War, it thought of itself as being
the policeman of the world, and played the role militarily. Not once – yes, not
once – did it do a job good enough to merit a thank you note from the rest of
humanity. For example, it made such a mess on the Korean
Peninsula , it created a nuclear
monster in North Korea .
It made a mess in Vietnam
and suffered a humiliating defeat from which it has not recovered. It made the
kind of mess in Iraq
that demonstrated once and for all you can get kicked in the butt by the
backward despite your technological superiority. The same goes for America 's defeat in the even more backward Afghanistan .
After trying and failing to get America
involved in more military adventures in the Arab and Muslim worlds, the Jewish
leaders of America
cooperated with Israel ,
and they put down a strategy for using the superpower to establish themselves
as the morality policeman of the world. To this end, they turned the Congress
and a good part of the State Department into what you might call a Jewish Bench
for the World. From that vantage point, they started passing judgment on such
things as the human rights situation in the places where they have designs, and
where they wish to make their presence felt.
And no one in the world is spared because nothing is sacred
except Israel .
It is allowed to maintain the criminal occupation of Palestine , practice a virulent form of
criminal apartheid, and allowed to mass murder civilians that cannot defend
themselves nor have someone defending them. Israel
and the Jews are able to do all that precisely because America stands as a sentinel protecting Israel from
criticism and from any military action by a foreign power that might clip its
wings.
And in the same way that America has become the military
has-been of the world despite what it is able to field in terms of weaponry,
the Jews are slowly but surely turning it into the moral, cultural and
humanitarian has-been of the world despite its past accomplishments in these
fields.