Sunday, February 5, 2017

Bizarre Ritual infesting American Politics

When I was a kid growing up in a French colony, we used to play a game on the 14th of July every year. This was the anniversary of the 1789 French Revolution that did away with the monarchy and replaced it with a republican form of government.

The game consisted of splitting ourselves into two groups, one calling itself Monarchists; the other Republicans. Each of us would give a speech proclaiming which side of the divide we're on – not by self-identification – but by denouncing the other side as forcefully as we could. That is, if I'm a Monarchist, I tell why it is bad to be a Republican … or the other way around.

That was many decades ago, something I had forgotten about till recently when the event popped into my memory as I watched modern Americans play the game of politics. In using the word 'recently,' I mean it was within the last decade or two that I began to sense a change in the way that the Americans played the political game. It seemed to shift from being a specialty of mature grownups to that of immature juveniles.

The first indication of the transformation I remember vividly is someone complaining that the letter “W” was torn off the White House computers shortly after the Supreme Court had ruled George W. Bush to be the winner of the 2000 election. It signaled that his team, and not that of then Vice President Al Gore, will be moving into the White House, and those already in there thinking they will be for Gore did not like the Court's ruling one bit. Their behavior was the closest thing I had seen to the game I used to play as a kid.

Eight years later, Barack Obama moved into the White House, and because I never detected anything he did deliberately to distance himself from the policies of his predecessor, I was surprised to see the media consider almost every move he made to be a repudiation of the W. Bush presidency. The more I tried to interpret what he did as being a repudiation of the Bush policies – to see things from the opposite point of view – the more I found them to be not that at all. In fact, they always proved to be policies that cohered and that fell in line with Obama's overarching philosophy of peaceful coexistence.

Given that the W. Bush years were managed by his hawkish Vice President Dick Cheney, it made sense that I should consider the contrast between the two administrations to be a reflection of the differences between dovish Obama and hawkish Cheney. And then, the passage of time simplified the rules of the game the media contributors were playing. They came to see every situation as being a simple binary choice: either Obama was repudiating the Bush approach or he was imitating Bush. They could not see Obama as himself doing what he believed was the right thing for the country.

We now have a new administration in the White House, and the media is at it again, playing that same game with a vengeance. You have the Progressive Liberals saying that after only two weeks in the White House, Donald Trump is beginning to imitate his predecessor Barack Obama. And you have the Conservative Republicans rejecting this interpretation. You can see an example of this shenanigan in the article that came under the title: “Trump Isn't Repeating Obama's Middle East Mistakes,” written by Jonathan S. Tobin, and published on February 3, 2017 in National Review Online.

Look how Tobin starts his discussion: “Contrary to mainstream-media reports, the new president is already taking [similar] stances as his predecessor [but] President Donald Trump has discovered it is actually possible to garner applause from the mainstream media.” In other words, Jonathan Tobin is trying to have it both ways for Trump. He is saying: yes, Trump may look like he is imitating Obama, but that's only because he is shrewd enough to get the mainstream-media to applaud him.

To understand the game that Jonathan Tobin is playing, you need to see him as the fanatic Zionist that he is. What he did here is race ahead of the mob of Jewish pundits, conveying to the Jewish rank-and-file (those still on Israel's side and those who left it) the news that under Trump, America is back in Israel's corner. The message is that they should rally around Israel no matter their political stripe because great days are ahead for the Jews and for Israel.

The hope is that the rest of the media will not jump on the bandwagon and see every situation as being a simple binary choice: either Trump is a political clone of Obama or he is a nemesis.