Friday, February 24, 2017

Managing America's Democracy from afar

There has been a change in America, and the Judeo-Israeli cabal is adjusting itself to take control and assume full command of the new situation there. Members of the cabal have been at it for a long time, and despite the occasional mishap, had enough successes that they can teach the Russians a thing or two on how to influence and micromanage the American democracy from afar.

There was a time when Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel and head of the cabal, used to remind his troops that “we know how to do these things.” The problem, however, is that he did very badly while Barack Obama was the commander-in-chief, elected to run the country. And so, like the wolf that has not eaten in eight years, Netanyahu's appetite for devouring the seat of power in America, has grown to a size that dwarfs the Milky Way galaxy.

Replacing Obama, the newly elected man in the White House being of the kind that will not let a handful of congressional bimbos of either gender blackmail him, the Judeo-Israeli cabal has realized that to play the old game without alteration will not work as well as it did before Obama's tenure. And so, instead of working on the congress to gain its confidence with words alone, the cabal is adding images to the words. That is, instead of telling the bimbos: 'believe us when we say the Arabs are bad and we are good,' they are telling them: 'I was in this Arab country, I saw some things ... and boy, do I have images and impressions to throw at you!”

You can see the effect of this new approach when you go over two articles that came out on two consecutive days in two different publications. The first came under the title: “The kingdom, the power and the oil,” and the subtitle: “Saudi Arabia wants to become an authentic nation.” It was written by Clifford D. May and published on February 21, 2017 in The Washington Times. The second article came under the title: “Egypt Looks for an Expanded Role in America's Foreign Policy,” written by Seth J. Frantzman,' and published on February 22, 2017 in National Review Online.

To give himself an air of credibility for doing something he never did before, Clifford May begins by slapping the eyes of his readers with this: “Saudi Arabia is changing.” Now that you know Clifford May is changing his ways for no reason other than Saudi Arabia is changing, you should stop wandering. May's credibility thus cemented, the American Congress will most certainly believe whatever he'll say, and build-up the courage to confront the new guy in the White House.

This done, May tells the reader that what he is about to say concerning Saudi Arabia, is of utmost importance because that country is “the heart of the Arab and Islamic worlds.” Without specifying that the heart is different from the rest of the Arab body, the author describes a country that is as socially different from Lebanon or Egypt or Tunisia as North Korea is politically different from South Korea. May's intent is to make the readers believe that all Arabs are generally worse than the worst impulses of the country at the bottom rung.

And so, he explains that because the Saudis have realized that their oil wealth will not last for ever, they are diversifying their economy, a move that will lead to the creation of a private sector, which in turn will lead to a country where “people will be freer –– which is not to say they would be free.” To wit, up until last year, the Saudis had a religious police force that enforced a dress code, gender apartheid and mandatory observance of prayer times. The force is still there but can only observe and report to the regular police who take it from there.

As well, “Jews and Christians continue to be denounced from some Saudi pulpits … the textbooks used in schools have not been completely purged of passages intended to inspire animosity toward non-believers. [By] 2030, Saudi Arabia may become less brutally repressive compared to most Muslim nations in the Middle East.”

That is, Clifford May is saying that Saudi Arabia is not there yet. It may or may not get there by the year 2030, but the other Muslim nations will never get there, he says. But the truth being that most of the other nations are ahead of Saudi Arabia, May's lie proves to be as large as the size of his appetite and the size of the Milky Way put together.

As to Seth Frantzman, he studiously avoided mentioning the glowing reports which are coming from every direction … all describing the good times to which Egypt and its economy are heading. Instead of doing that, the author dredged out the falsehoods that people of his ilk used spread while yodeling the refrain: The end is near for Egypt.

Having suppressed the vision that's forming about the future of Egypt, Frantzman said this: “It is a country in waiting, worried about what the future brings, and deeply rooted in the past.” He then cherry-picked the difficult moments of the past six years and described them as if they were unfolding in the present.

This done, he makes the point that Egypt can still be useful for something. It is this: “Cairo could play a role in regional security frameworks, sometimes dubbed 'Arab NATO,' that could confront Iran and other terror threats.” Evidently, he would be happy to see America nudge Egypt in that direction.

But what about Israel? Was it not supposed to be doing this job? After all, it received a billion dollars for a fictitious something called the “Iron Dome,” and a pledge for 38 billion more, milked out of the school lunch program that used to feed the children of America, and given to the Israeli military that kills the children of Palestine.

The time has come to bring sanity back to America's system of governance.