It is getting monotonous with the Holocaust psychos coming
out the woodwork to tell America
what to do, how to spend its money, who to love, who to hate, who to avoid
talking to, who to bomb, how and where to pimp for Israel , and just about everything
else.
The latest to join Nikki Haley doing the Salome Dance on the
UN stage, is Anne Bayefsky whose contribution this time came under the title:
“U.N. Human Rights Council –– Get Out of the Quicksand or Drown,” published on
February 26, 2017 in National Review Online. Her first sentence is to the
point, expressed concisely and whorishly as follows: “The Trump administration
should withdraw the U.S.
from the Council”.
Bayefsky tries to build her case by accusing former President
Barack Obama of this: “Pitting minorities against each other was, after all, an
Obama specialty.” So then, what does she do to prove her point? Well, she
mentions Barack Obama eleven times in the article, trying to drive a wedge
between his administration and the Trump administration. In case you missed it,
this is proof that to accuse others of what they are, is a Jewish disease that
is so ingrained in their religious culture, the practitioners not only refuse
to correct their stance when the hypocrisy is pointed out to them, they double
down on it – with pride.
The philosophy behind the fury which erupts the volcano in
Bayefsky's belly at regular cadence can be summed up as follows: The United
Nations did the right thing when, in the name of humanity, voted Israel
into existence. But now that Israel
is here, it must be held above the law because it is the home of the Jews who
are the favored children of God. Consequently, any criticism of Israel by the humanity that created it can only
mean that this same humanity has gone mad, and is ganging up on Israel . Do you
know what else it means? It means that the whole world is evil and Israel is
saintly.
To explain that point to a human race that's way past
redemption, Anne Bayefsky begins by calling the Human Rights Council of the
United Nations “the most anti-Israel, twisted bastion of moral relativism in
the U.N. system.” If you don't see the logic in this, my friend, let me explain
it to you. Relativism is the opposite of absolutism. Because Bayefsky's
morality is based on the absoluteness of Jewish supremacy, she cannot stand a
Council that passes judgment on Israel
for the crime that is the continued occupation of Palestine . She gets uneasy because Israel 's
infractions are measured relative to those committed by others. And when you
put 'absolute' and 'relative' in the same argument, you double the eruption in
Anne's belly.
Together with North Korea ,
Israel
is the entity that has disobeyed every Council resolution passed against it
during the past six or seven decades. When the nations that she accuses of
abusing human rights are hit with a similar resolution, they acknowledge their
transgression, vow to improve their performance, and take measures to alter
their conduct as well as that of their subordinates. This is why the Council
does not need to keep reminding them of their transgressions the way that it
does Israel .
Bayefsky cannot be made to understand this.
Because the Jews do not accept any kind of criticism leveled
against Israel , they want it
banned at the UN in the same way it is banned in the New York Times, the Wall
Street Journal, CNN, Fox News, and everywhere else in the Grand Old Democracy
that is still America
but no longer a genuine democracy. And so, when criticism is leveled by the Human
Rights Council against Israel in the form of a resolution, the volcano in
Bayefsky's belly erupts ferociously, and she lashes out at all of humanity …
including the former President of the United States.
Two moves (she expects the Council to make in the session
that just started) gall her more than anything. One has to do with the
blacklisting of companies doing business in Jewish settlements built on
occupied Palestinian land. The other has to do with the occupation of Syria 's Golan Heights
by the Israeli military. If anything, this kind of outburst by Bayefsky and the
other Jews who write on the same subject, demonstrates that these people are
consumed by one thing only: stealing land from their neighbors. They feel it is
their religious duty to do so, and they try to practice it as frequently as
they get down to pray.
What brought the situation in the Middle East to this point
was the Jewish promise that if the United Nations gave the Jews a home in
Palestine, they would behave because they suffered long and hard to play the
tricks that brought pogroms and holocausts on their heads time after time. They
lied. And the mistake that humanity made was to believe them despite their long
history of treachery, cheating and double crossing.