Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Satloff to Trump: Come join the Gang Rape

Robert Satloff of the Washington Institute for Mideast Policy gave a speech the other day, parts of which were published on the website of the Institute on February 9, 2016 under the title: “The Trump-Netanyahu Meeting in the Context of Emerging U.S. Middle East Policy”.

Satloff says that Netanyahu will soon be in Washington, and will meet with President Trump at which time the two will discuss the Middle East. He promises to draw on the President's record and “identify four strategic objectives in his U.S. Middle East policy.” One of the objectives relates to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. But guess what Satloff does the moment that he mentions Israel. He breaks his promise. Instead of telling what Trump may be thinking, he tells what he thinks Trump ought to think. Look at this condensed passage:

“For Israel, the new relationship is certain to be robust; it has the potential to develop into the sort of friendship enjoyed by Clinton and Rabin. But the paradox is that Israel's strategic need from Washington goes far beyond the bilateral relationship. What Israel really needs is a reassertion of American leadership. Is President Trump willing to be a captain of a team that entails deepening U.S. involvement in the region?”

If you're surprised to see Satloff ask America to get deeply involved in the Middle East when the Jews were telling it to buzz off not long ago, you should know that the Israelis have gone through this cycle many times before. When they get into trouble, they want America to come and protect them. When they feel confident, they tell America to buzz off. Now that they want America back, what are they worried about?

The short answer is that the Jews are worried about Iran. But there is something else – the occupation of Palestine – for which they want America back in the region. First, let's see what Satloff says about Iran: “The top priority for Netanyahu is to educate the president on the priority of confronting the Iran threat and to focus US-Israel cooperation on that effort. The challenge is to do this without confronting the president's commitment to prioritize the destruction of IS”.

Second, now that Satloff has educated the President, let's see what he says about Palestine:

“A priority for Netanyahu is to reach understanding with trump on the peace process and settlement activity … To meet the political objectives; an agreement would need to allow Netanyahu to return to Israel with a victory so he can withstand the pressure from his right wing to approve settlement plans whose intent is to prevent a peace accord. George W. Bush and Ariel Sharon reached such an agreement. It would require the Trump team to draw on historical memory and diplomatic expertise they may not have on staff”.

What Satloff has done is admit that the settlers who are gang raping the Palestinian motherland have always intended “to prevent a peace accord” from happening. Netanyahu is so beholden to them – for whatever reason – he needs Trump to give him a victory he can use to placate those primitive savages. As to the kind of victory Netanyahu needs, there is nothing to it, says Satloff, because George W. Bush and Ariel Sharon had one. Is that so? Well then, why do they need another one? And by the way, what did the first one accomplish? Did they get the peace accord they are promising now? Or is this another Jewish promise to get something they intend to pocket and then bite the hand that gave it to them?

And of course, there is also the matter of Jerusalem. To persuade Trump that he should help Netanyahu there too, Satloff begins by classifying the rape gangsters he is confronting as (1) the ordinary ones he just talked about and (2) the “more extreme members of his coalition.” He says he wants the American embassy moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and promises that doing so will benefit America too. How is that, you ask?

Well, can you imagine George Orwell falling into the rabbit hole and trying to send a message to the real world above? He would sound like this: “An embassy move would likely be accompanied by a US expression of appreciation for Israel's agreement that the permanent status of Jerusalem will be determined in negotiations, the outcome of which the United States will support.” I kid you not; this is Satloff's message to Trump.

And there is the typical Jewish sending of a fake distress signal. Hurry, hurry, hurry, he cries out. Here are his words: “The timing of a potential embassy move is crucial. If the president is committed to implementing it, he should probably do so quickly”.