Wednesday, April 12, 2017

The use of Boolean Logic to control America

If you wonder how the Jews managed to effectuate a takeover of the United States of America in half a century, you may wish to study Richard Cohen's latest column because something in it will give you the insight you seek. The column came under the title: “The Syria strike was the right decision –– by the wrong person,” and was published on April 10, 2017 in the Washington Post.

You'll find there is logic to the method used by the Jews to pull-off each of the small feats whose cumulative effect has resulted in giving them a near total control over America. In fact, you'll not be the first to have tried to understand the logic behind a method such as that. An English mathematician named George Boole in the Nineteenth Century preoccupied himself with such questions because he got tired listening to the politicians of his time talk nonsense, and he wanted to do something about it. His effort led him to the creation of a branch of mathematics we now call Boolean algebra.

Boole's work is too abstract to discuss on this occasion, but we are lucky in that almost a century after him, a Japanese engineer named Akira Nakashima rediscovered the same principles, unaware of Boole's work. The difference between the two, however, is that Nakashima did not go through abstract mathematics to get there. He went through practical electrical applications … which happen to be much simpler to explain.

What he did was use a large number of switches to guide electrical signals throughout a vast network of wires. This network (called logic circuit) would have inputs at one end where the signals go in. It would also have outputs at the other end where the signals would or would not come out depending on which set of switches were ON, and which were OFF. Nakashima could thus create the pattern he wanted at the output by turning the switches ON or OFF. A familiar pattern we see at the output of many applications is the 7-segment display of the digits 0 to 9. Another pattern is used in the display of the letters of the alphabet such as those we see on a computer monitor. And then there are the marvelous images that the computers display.

Look now how a network of writers – such as the mob of Jewish pundits – can organize itself to operate like a Nakashima circuit. It will place each of the pundits in a position where he or she will control one of the switches; or even a number of them. Depending on the input command that's given by the boss, the pundits will turn the switches ON or OFF, thus produce the desired pattern at the output. You can see how all that comes together in the Richard Cohen article.

For the OFF positions, Richard Cohen says this: (1) it was bad to have missiles launched against Syria by this President, as opposed to any other president. (2) It was bad to attack Syria because the President was sickened by television pictures of the slaughter. (3) It was bad that the “stated policy of this President was 'some absurdity called America First.'” (4) It was bad that he did not consult with the Congress. (5) It was bad that a “cocksure President used the power of his office any way he wants.” (6) It was bad that he disregarded the “nettlesome constitutional questions and the nagging examples of history”. (7) It is bad that the President is the 'least knowledgeable and least stable commander-in-chief in American history'”.

As for the ON positions, Richard Cohen says this: (1) It was good that “59 Tomahawk missiles slammed into Syria.” (2) It was good that the President changed policy on Syria. (3) “Even better, Donald Trump reversed Barack Obama's shameful retreat from the brink.” (4) It is good that the President will now “get a bump in the polls.” (5) It is good that this President will learn that when it comes to ratings, “a military strike is better than infrastructure any day. It takes less time too”.

When the command signals go into the input, and they are switched ON or OFF, thus directed to their correct destinations, they result in an output pattern that conveys the following message:

It is absurd for the President of the United States of America to look after the interests of the American people. There is a world out there that hates Israel as demonstrated by what goes on at the United Nations. The logical thing for the President to do is spend time working on ways to defend, protect and promote Israel. He will not do that by building new bridges in America where old ones crumble or by building new roads where old ones are filled with potholes or by shoring up an electric grip that's becoming vulnerable to cyber attacks.

The President will have to drop all that, and dedicate himself to Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel.