The Washington Post
is staging an anti-Egypt venom puking festival.
Its own deputy
editorial page editor, Jackson Diehl, is regurgitating his disgusting stuff in
an article that came under the title: “What Trump should ask a brutal dictator
as he welcomes him to the White House,” published on April 2, 2017. On that
same day two old-time professional pukers, Robert Kagan and Michelle Dunne,
were invited to publish: “It's time to take a hard look at the U.S. relationship with Egypt ,” a
regurgitation of the same disgusting stuff.
The difference
between a human being suffering from a stomach infection that makes him reject
what he eats, and a sick dog, is that the first will run to the bathroom and
relieve his stomach in private so as not to disgust the people in the vicinity.
The dog, by contrast, will disgorge what his stomach cannot hold in the public
square and in full view of everyone that's there, thus disgusting everybody.
Well, you find that
same sort of difference among those who traffic in fake news. There are those
who do things so discreetly, you barely know what they are up to. And there are
those – like Diehl, Kagan and Dunne – who imitate the sick dog in a mindless
attack on Egypt .
But their game is so transparent, a child can see through it.
The depth of their
ignorance is manifested throughout their presentation, but nowhere is it as
stark as in their discussion of the Egyptian economy. They collected every bit
of information that's in the public domain – from the modernization of the Suez Canal to the floating of the currency – and said
they were bad decisions for the country's economy. They did so despite the
tsunami of information, analysis and projections which say that Egypt
has turned the corner, and is on its way to a magnificent recovery. Due to
what? Due to the steps that were taken by the government which they and every
sicko like them are maligning.
Another staple of
the venom puke-machine is something you witness every time that a discussion is
held concerning the administration of justice outside America . Here
you see and hear people – in the country of the infamous Simpson Trial – label
everything they hear about in a foreign country as “trumped up charges,” which
they say are leveled by a corrupt judicial system against innocent people.
They have done it in
this case as automatically as a computer program that's caught in a loop.
Talking about a woman that's on trial in Egypt , here is how Diehl put it:
“imprisoned on crudely trumped up charges.” And speaking more generally, here
is how Kagan and Dunne put it: “Americans and Egyptians who work with Western
organizations, have faced trumped-up charges”.
What is it that
these people are after, anyway? Their hearts certainly do not bleed because –
as they claim – the people of Egypt
are not breathing the fresh air of freedom. What they wish to see happen in Egypt are the
plagues that were described in the Jewish Old Testament thousands of years ago.
A modern version of that would be what we see in the Levant
at this time. Unless and until this happens to Egypt , the monsters of the venom
puke-machine will remain in the attack mode.
And so, at the same
time as they run around (all worked up like an out-of-control ballistic
missile) about their system of governance being interfered with by a foreign
power – and not knowing how to deal with it – they puke all that venom of hate
and jealousy because Egypt
has dealt successfully with such interference and has quashed it. What makes
their pain even more unbearable is that they are the ones trying to interfere
with the Egyptian system of governance, and they are the ones who got quashed.
Just think about it.
They maneuvered America
into a position where it tried to interfere with the system of other countries.
The attempt failed. Meanwhile, someone else looked at what America was trying to do and said: why not do it
to America .
That someone succeeded doing to America
what America
failed to do to others. I mean, if you were a Diehl, a Kagan or a Dunne, would
you not be mad like hell?