Time after time the Jewish leaders walked into a perilous
situation without an exit strategy or a plan B on which to fall back in case
something went wrong. And time after time something did go wrong, and the innocent
Jewish rank and file that the leaders dragged behind them, paid a heavy price
for the irresponsible behavior and the myopia of those who deceived them.
At times the Jewish leaders even convinced someone like
Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union or Anthony Eden of the United Kingdom or Guy Mollet of France to walk
with them into a situation that was described as a cakewalk, only for the fools
to realize they made a big mistake listening to charlatans. They eventually
pulled back, with Stalin doing so before his country had suffered serious
damage.
As to Anthony Eden and Guy Mollet, their two countries
quickly descended into irrelevance. Some historians have even argued that Britain ceased to be an empire as a result of
its participation in the ill-advised Suez
adventure. In time, the three countries cut their ties with the Jews, licked
their wounds and promised themselves never again to be taken for sucker by a
Jew.
The same cannot be said about the newest fool to be suckered
by those same Jews, however. Despite its repeated humongous losses, the United States of America
– acting like a giant supplicant to an Israeli midget that's bossing it around
like a slave driver – continues to let the Jews send it into one misadventure
after another. Two articles, one written by a Jew living in Israel ; the other by a Jew living in America , tell a
story that could easily be adapted for The Twilight Zone.
Shmuel Rosner, who lives in Israel ,
wrote: “Why Israel can't
Support a Cease-Fire in Syria ,”
an article that was published on July 20, 2017 in the New York Times. Two days
later, the American columnist Bret Stephens published: “Trump's Foreign Policy:
The Conservatives' Report Card,” appearing also in the NY Times that has become
the new base of operation for Stephens since his defection from the
conservative Wall Street Journal.
Rosner's point is that Israel
finds itself backed into a corner from which it cannot see a way out because
the cease-fire that was arranged by America
and Russia seems to take
hold in Syria .
No option except the one upon which Israel has always relied, can save
it now from its quandary. Rosner describes the option as follows: “The United States , being a superpower, must have a
strategy for Syria .”
No kidding!
So here you have it, the Jews who sent America into the Middle East without a strategy
or a plan B, but only with the promise that Assad is doomed, that Syria will become Putin's Vietnam , and that Iran 's influence will be contained
– are now admitting that all those predictions turned out to be false. The
consequence is that the situation in the Levant has come close to the point of
no return, and the Jews are begging America
to develop a strategy for Syria
that will save Israel .
Who would have thought?
As to the Bret Stephens article, the writer's point is that
President Donald Trump has not lived up to the conservative foreign policy he
promised he will adopt if elected. One reason why Stephens levels this charge
is that once elected, “Trump showed how eager he was to oblige the man in the
Kremlin, this time at the expense of Israel .” He is lamenting that the
cease-fire which is meant to save Syrian lives, will disadvantage Israel in the competition it is running against Iran to become the hegemon of the Levant . What were those two leaders thinking? That a
million Syrian lives are more valuable than the ego of a bunch of Jewish
losers? Phew!
Thus, on one hand, America
becomes a worthy superpower only when it rescues Israel every time that the little
thing puts itself into trouble, according to the Israeli Shmuel Rosner. On the
other hand, the Republican Party becomes worthy of its conservative label only
when it caters to the needs of Israel ,
always Israel and no one but
Israel ,
according to the Jewish American Bret Stephens. But what does the authentic
American public think?
Two relevant questions remain hanging in the air. One: Will America relent under pressure similar to the
non-stop nagging that's produced by the likes of Shmuel Rosner, and go back to
playing the role of Israel 's
bodyguard? Two: Will the Republican Party relent under pressure similar to that
produced by Bret Stephens, and go back to being the obedient servant of Israel , as well
as the supplier of all its needs?