A group of kind-looking con artists will score a few
successes at the start of a new project they undertake because societies that
wish to move ahead are geared to giving its beginners a chance to prove
themselves.
These societies will even give the benefit of the doubt to
the beginners that make mistakes on their way to mastering their craft and to
producing better performances. But if repeated errors start to show a pattern
that indicates an unhealthy scheme is behind the performance, the affected
society will take back its approval of the group. And this is what happened to
the Jews a zillion times during the four millenniums they have been swindling
the human race around the globe.
The latest society to fall prey to the Jews has been the United States of America ,
and that's where we see, in real time, a live performance of what happens
inside such a group when the members sense they were outed, and shown to be
what they really are and what they want. They demonstrate how quickly they can
point the finger at each other in a game of mutual recrimination. This tendency
is clearly apparent in the drama that's unfolding in the latest article by Bret
Stephens. It came under the title: “President Jabberwock and the Jewish Right,”
published on August 19, 2017 in the New York Times.
The point Stephens is making misleads the readers because
the author reduces the difference between his splintered right-wing Jewish camp
and the main right-wing Jewish camp, to trusting or distrusting Donald Trump.
But something happens when the writer struggles to develop his idea: a bigger
truth comes out. It shows there is only one right-wing Jewish agenda, and it
has not changed even after the split in two. Thus, the difference between them boils
down, not to the content of the agenda, but to the way it must be implemented.
You get a sense of the agenda's content when you read the
following passage: “He [Trump] would rip up the Iran deal. He wasn't afraid to call
out the Islamofascists by name. He 'got' Israel 's
[back] and wasn't going to abide the State Department's piety about the peace
process or the location of the U.S. Embassy [in Israel ]. He'd rebuild the
military”.
As to the method of implementation, it seems that Bret
Stephens and those in his camp were stricken by the Holocaust psychosis more
than the other camp. They are therefore more sensitive to the possible
existence of hidden meanings in the Donald Trump discourse, than their opposing
counterparts. You get a sense of this reality when you read the following
passage:
“You could smell it in the citation of a Benito Mussolini
quote; an image of Hillary Clinton alongside a six-pointed star and a pile of
cash … in the denunciation of 'international banks' and the 'enemy of the American
people' news media … in the resurrection of 'America First' as an organizing
political slogan –– a politics of exclusion that has never served Jews well
even when we were suffered to be included”.
To know that the election of Donald trump led to the split
of the Right into what Bret Stephens calls the “right-of-center Jews” and
whatever else, does not tell the full story. How this splinter group came into
being must be added to the mix when analyzing the current situation. These
people are the offspring of the new conservatives (neocons) who were themselves
liberals because their parents were liberal, having suffered under the European
Right before migrating to America .
In fact, politically speaking, the Jews of America resembled
those that lived in Israel 's
kibbutzes at the time. Because it took the Palestinians at least a full
generation under occupation before mounting a movement of resistance, the Jews
remained liberal in Israel
and America
too. But when the Palestinians started to resist the occupation, the Jews of
Israel started to turn Right, and so did those of America . They defected the
Democratic Party to join the Republican Party, thus became the neocons.
Aside from a handful of “old guard” conservatives that
resented the advent of the newcomers in their midst, the rest of that society
tolerated or welcomed the neocons. The trouble is that, being third and fourth
generation Americans, the youngsters lost the sense of discreteness that their
ancestors lived by when expressing their political views. Indeed, the younger
generation became in-your-face, brash and demanding.
Its members infiltrated and took over most of the strategic
institutions in America ,
especially the media. In response, the society that welcomed them now began to
reject them. Its anger is what Trump has expressed during the presidential
campaign; its views are those he articulates as President. This is why Bret
Stephens and the others in his camp are defecting back to the liberals.