As surely as night follows day, you can expect the mob of
Jewish pundits and their echo repeaters to come out in force and badmouth the
International Criminal Court (I.C.C.) now that the Palestinians are almost certain
to take their case against Israel
to the only place where they can still get a semblance of justice.
Badmouthing everything and everyone that does not serve
their purpose is the double-edged sword that the Jews have used throughout the
centuries to hurt other people. In the process, they also hurt themselves,
though they do not realize it. Their favorite method is to speak ill of people
behind their backs even as they smile in their faces. It is an incurable
disease that has earned the Jews the contempt of everyone, everywhere and at
all time.
Now that the Jews have discovered the reality that the
International Criminal Court will not be serving Israel 's agenda, they started
badmouthing it. In fact, not only will the Court not serve Israel , it will eventually establish what
everyone knows is true, namely that Israel is as bad a criminal as any
organized crime can get. For this reason, the anticipated court judgment will
severely impact Israel 's
ability to continue benefiting from the crimes it has been committing with
impunity since the day of its establishment.
An article vilifying the ICC––that will most certainly open
the floodgate for similar articles to gush out the echo chamber––came under the
title: “Can the International Criminal Court Be Saved from Itself?” It was
written by Thierry Cruvellier and published on December 18, 2017 in the New
York Times.
Without once mentioning Israel– –on
whose behalf the echo chamber is about to blow a storm of slanderous opinions
hurled at the ICC––Thierry Cruvellier has managed to build a case in which he
ended up telling the ICC to keep its hand off Israel . To get there, however, he
was forced to violate the heretofore taboo of throwing America under
the bus.
What Cruvellier did is begin the article by giving the
impression he was prompted to write the thing, not because of the recent
developments regarding the Palestinian decision to take Israel to
Court, but because of something that happened a month ago. It was the Court's
decision to open an investigation in the role that American troops have played
with regard to the crimes that were committed in Afghanistan , he says. Who is he
kidding?
He quickly got out of telling this story, and went after the
credibility of the Court. Like a highly trained henchman, he started the attack
at the moment when the Court was created. Here is what he said in this regard:
“The court was controversial from the moment it was created: the U.S. , China
and Russia
opposed its foundational treaty, the Rome Statute.” This done, Cruvellier went
after the apparent impotence of the Court to do its job, accusing it of being
too slow, inefficient and sloppy.
What he dished out under the rubric of impotence, is the
standard criticism the Jews invented to use against the international institutions
that refuse to turn themselves into assemblies of the brain dead, modeled after
the American Congress. But when the so-called critics used it against Boutros
Ghali, former Secretary General of the United Nations, he told them that the
World Body is as good as the members it is made of. Using different words, he
went on to explain that when Jewish America sabotages the good work that the UN
is doing, the kettle is not making the tea black; it is the tea that is calling
the kettle black.
In his article, Thierry Cruvellier continued to insist that
the ICC has a problem of credibility due to its own doings. He then seized on
this contrived premise to advise the Court on how it can work to regain
credibility. To this end, he basically laid out a plan in three steps, one of
which may be called the stealthy step. It consists of not mentioning Israel in
conjunction with the ICC, or when crimes against humanity are discussed.
The other two steps deal with Afghanistan
and Libya .
As to Afghanistan ,
his recommendation is a simple one. He says the Americans will not cooperate
with the ICC, so why waste time and continue to look slow, inefficient and
sloppy. The solution: Do not bother with America ’s
role in Afghanistan
either.
This leaves Libya ,
about which he says the following: “In this instance, the court has a better
chance to have an impact. The prosecutor is more likely to be able to act
swiftly.” Cruvellier is taking the world for the kind of imbeciles you find
only in the American Congress.