They have been doing the same thing for 4,000 years and
getting the same result. Strangely enough, they are still blaming their woes on
everyone but themselves. If this is not insanity, what is?
A painful cycle that should never exist starts when the Jews
point to the last pogrom or holocaust and accuse humanity of suffering a defect
they call antisemitism. They use this approach to ask the existing authorities
to intervene on their behalf. When this happens, they recommend harsh treatment
for the individuals that do not kowtow to their demands. From there, they
gradually escalate their demands till they cover the entire society. And this
is how the next pogrom or holocaust is triggered. It is a never-ending case of
here we go again!
To see how that cycle unfolds, you may study an article that
came under the title: “The Uncomfortable Truth About Swedish Anti-Semitism,”
written by Paulina Neuding and published on December 14, 2017 in the New York
Times. The writer begins by making the correct observation, but then
immediately spins it as if to load a machine gun and point it at the Jews
throughout the world.
Here is Neuding's observation: “Jews are by now used to
anti-Semitic threats and attacks –– especially during periods of unrest in the
Middle East...” and here is her spin: “...which provide cover to those whose
actual goal has little to do with Israel and much to do with harming Jews.” But
what's the utility of this spin? It is to say there is nothing wrong with Israel and nothing wrong with those who finance
the crimes it commits against the unarmed people of Palestine .
What's wrong, she means to say, resides in humanity itself –
and this can only be a genetic defect called antisemitism. Her recommendation,
therefore, is that we must look for a solution to the problem that does not
include the Jews. It will have to be a solution that punishes the individuals
who do not behave as instructed, even if that ends up covering all of society.
Having fabricated a dishonest spin, and believing it will
hold in the minds of the readers no matter how much she contradicts herself,
Paulina Neuding went on contradicting herself like there is no tomorrow. Here
is a sampling of that:
“People protested Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel . Some of the country's
leaders have used Israel to
explain violence … Sweden 's
foreign minister explained radicalism among Europeans with reference to Israel : 'Here, we are brought to situations like
the one in the Middle East , where the
Palestinians see that there isn't a future. We must either accept a desperate
situation or resort to violence'”.
While that was a glaring kind of contradiction, the Jews
also practice a more subtle kind; one that adds to their sliminess just the
same. It is called the ‘double-standard.’ To understand how it works, we
compare what Paulina Neuding says must be done, and what she says must not be
done.
Here is her argument as to what must be done: “Prime
Minister Lofven was asked whether Sweden was naïve about the link
between immigration and anti-Semitism. His response was: 'We have a problem
with anti-Semistism, and it doesn't matter who expresses it.' But the problem
grew so dire, he later admitted 'We will not ignore the fact that people have
come from the Middle East where anti-Semitism is widespread. We must become
clearer, dare to talk more about it.' He's right. Unfortunately, the country's
news media is often unable to speak plainly about the issue”.
And here is her argument as to what must not be done: “Sweden 's newspaper, Aftonbladet, accused Israel of
harvesting Palestinian organs –– the modern equivalent of the blood libel. The
state TV attributed Trump's announcement on Jerusalem
to the extreme strength of the Jewish lobby in the United States . Sweden 's
leading news agency cited 'influential Jewish donors' in its analysis of the
move. The Swedish press often crosses the line into vilification of the Jewish
state and regularly insinuates that events in the Middle
East are directed by powerful Jews in the West. This risks stoking
already dangerous anti-Jewish sentiment”.
Thus, what she means to convey with these two statements, is
that Sweden
must stoke anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiments but not anti-Jewish sentiment.
Now, my friend, stop for a moment and think about it. If
after 4,000 years of this kind of behavior––and the various punishments that
resulted, these people still have not learned their lesson––what can we do to
save them from themselves?
The first thing we do is acknowledge that the Jewish leaders
are able to maintain the self-destructive posture that's characteristic of them
because they succeeded at weaponizing and exploiting the Holocaust.
Therefore, the effort to save the Jews (from their
self-appointed leaders) must include a prohibition on all governments to spend
money that would be used to memorialize the Holocaust.
Also, the politico-journalistic establishment must be on
alert at all time, and push back against attempts to speak of the Holocaust
other than in historical terms.