Winston Churchill once remarked that “you can always count
on Americans to do the right thing after they've tried everything else”.
And like everything else, there are two ways to look at this
quote. You can think of America
stumbling when trying something new, but then discovering the correct way to
handle it and staying on the right path. Or you can think of America going
through the endless cycle of alternating between doing the right thing and
doing the wrong thing, thus prove it is made of human beings like the rest of
us.
You don't have to dig deeply into America 's
past to discover that it stands on the remains of massacred “New World”
natives, and the slavery of human beings imported from Africa .
In fact, this history is being unveiled at this time by a movement that's
dedicated to removing the statues of Confederacy and other evil doers who used
to adorn a number of public places in America .
The Republic seems to have entered an era of normalcy with
the start of the Twentieth Century. Coincidentally, however, the world was
entering a period of conflict that involved the newly industrialized powers of
Europe and Western Asia . Timid ,
America wanted to stay out
of that conflict but the sinking of a ship called Lusitania forced it to change its mind.
That was World War One which was supposed to end all wars
but did not. Barely two decades later, mainly the same powers got tangled in
World War Two, and America
was again nudged into joining the side that eventually won the war. With so
much destruction heaped on the Old World and so little of it heaped on the New
World, America could afford to be magnanimous, if only to atone for the sins of
the past, and redeem itself. It helped rebuild the nations it destroyed, thus
acquired the moniker: “force for good”.
But was America
a force for good during the second half of the Twentieth Century and the start
of the Twenty First? Or did America
foul up after it helped rebuild its old foes? At long last, history is beginning
to reveal that the same people – namely the colonial powers and the Jews – who
instigated America 's
participation in the two world wars, were the ones that instigated America
to launch the Cold War, and participate in such ill advised wars as the Korean,
Vietnamese, Iraqi and Libyan disasters.
This says that America never was and never will be
the eternal force for good that some people believe it was created to be. America did
redeem itself previously, and the movement to reexamine its sordid past proves
it is trying to redeem itself again. But what this says on the whole, is that America is
prone – like everyone else – to go through the endless cycle of alternating
between doing the right things and doing the wrong things.
From this, we draw the conclusion that in the same way
America – which stands on a past of genocide and slavery – can at times be a
force for good and at times not, so can other groups that did not have a
glorious past. One of these could well be Austria 's Freedom Party which joined
a governing coalition with the People's Party.
Responding to that announcement, the Jewish influenced
editorial board of the New York Times acted in the typically Jewish manner of
going apoplectic over the event. The editors wrote: “Austria 's Welcome to a Party With a
Nazi Past,” the title of a piece they published on December 20, 2017.
Apparently, the people that reacted with fear and loathing
when Kurt Waldheim was elected President of Austria, have not learned a thing
about the gentiles' ability to rid themselves of the characteristic Jewish lust
for eternal vengeance. They did so by submitting to the healing powers of
redemption, a concept that is alien to the Jews.
Kurt Waldheim was an officer in the German military during
World War Two where he served as innocuously as any nondescript soldier. He
then became Secretary General of the United Nations where he did as good a job
as any that filled this position before returning to Austria and getting elected
President.
Motivated by Jewish-concocted fear and loathing, the editors
of the New York Times went on to describe a European Continent that is
descending into the kind of horror you see committed by the right-wing group
that's governing Israel
at this time. And they end their piece with the following advice:
“Ms. Merkel should be wary. The return of the far right in Austria is a sign of Europe 's
vulnerability, having failed to address citizens' concerns”.
Let me assure the editors of the New York Times that the
Europeans know what they are doing. They try a little of this and a little of
that without going to extremes, and when they find the right combination, they
codify it and implement it. They have been operating in this fashion for
several decades now.