Just think about it. For a moment they imagined they will
soon have the whole world in their hand. They thought the Levant
was going to disintegrate, and the pieces will fall in their lap. The Gulf
Arabs were going to quake in their boots for fear of Iran ,
and rush to hide behind Israel 's
skirt.
Other than that, Britain
was going to cheerfully exit Europe and join the new Judeo-Anglican-Hindu
Alliance (JAHA) made of Australia ,
America , Canada , Britain ,
Israel and India . The rest
of Europe was going to decay, with each
jurisdiction opting to forge a separate deal with the JAHA. Together, all these
jurisdictions will form a rising utopia governed by Jews assisted by such
lackeys as John Bolton and Dick Cheney.
And then, they woke up from their daydream and discovered
that the Levant was put back together by Russia
and Iran .
Europe was solidifying, and the Brits were
having second thoughts about exiting the union that benefited them enormously. Australia and Canada
were developing an allergic reaction for being ideologically too close to America . And India was reviving the golden age of
non-alliance by rekindling the love affair it had with Egypt , its
bosom buddy of yesteryear.
Far from being in disarray, they discovered that the world
was only shaking off the useless baggage it had accumulated over the decades.
It was rationalizing the situation surrounding it to prepare entering a new
era. In fact, this will be the start of a new epoch; one that will last till
there is no more snakes on this planet, and no more rats to be mesmerized by
them.
Snakes and rats? Who might be the snakes, and who might be
the rats? The snakes are the self-appointed leaders of the Jews who also carry
on the business of lobbying for Israel
and all the Jewish causes. As to the rats; they are the people who allow
themselves to be mesmerized by the snakes. Most prominent among these are the
characters that make up the politico-journalistic establishment in America .
You can see how two snakes are still trying to mesmerize the
American Congress of rats by reading the article that came under the title:
“Actually, Egypt Is a Terrible Ally,” written by Andrew Miller and Richard
Sokolsky. It was published on December 19, 2017 in the New York Times. The goal
of the two snakes being to isolate America
and monopolize it, they became alarmed by the relationship they saw burgeoning
between America and other
nations, one of these being Egypt .
And so they set out to drive a wedge between the two countries.
Knowing that they can mesmerize the Congress of rats and get
them to do what will serve the interests of Israel before swallowing them
whole, Miller and Sokolsky used the tried and proven techniques they perfected
over the decades. The ingredients that go into these techniques are (1) false
promises that good things will result in doing what Israel is asking. (2) False
promises that nothing bad will happen. (3) Practicing the Jewish pastime of
slandering others because it is the thing to do. (4) By doing what Israel wants, America
can regain the credibility it lost the last time it refused to do what Israel wanted.
Here is how the two authors elaborated on those points to
tell what will happen if America
decided to take their advice and reduce payment to Egypt :
First, “in addition to saving taxpayers' money, this would
send a message to other recipients of American aid.”
Comment: It is not clear whether or not Miller and Sokolsky
meant to include Israel
in this deal given that it has received hundreds of billions of dollars
already, and is slated to receive at least 38 billions more.
Second, “The risks are limited. Egypt is unlikely to change its
behavior in response to less aid”.
Comment: Unlike Israel ,
Egypt
does not depend on aid to stay afloat. It has been afloat for seven thousand
years, and no one knows that better than the Jews. Thus, the only reason the
two authors are making this suggestion, is to drive a wedge between the two
countries as discussed earlier.
Third, “Egyptian government's human rights abuses, which
fuel radicalization, increasing the global threat from terrorism.”
Comment: Global terrorism does not happen because of
internal considerations unless what happens internally is instigated by outside
influences. This is why most terrorist acts in Continental Europe are committed
by individuals with roots in the former French colonies of North
West Africa . Those which are committed in England and America
are carried out by individuals from Central and South East
Asia . 9/11 was carried out mostly by Saudi individuals in response
to America overstaying its
welcome in Saudi Arabia .
And now that the idea of a Caliphate is capturing the imagination of kids who
are made to believe the West is out to exterminate them, they join the cause
and spread throughout the world.
Fourth, “If the administration does this, it will take a
step toward restoring America 's
tarnished credibility and reputation in the region.”
Comment: In fact, America 's credibility in the region
was tarnished when the populations realized that their governments were being
influenced by outsiders. In Egypt ,
for example, the people demonstrated against the Muslim Brotherhood government
for accepting “aid” from Qatar .
They demonstrated when Egypt
handed 2 islands to Saudi
Arabia . They pelted Hillary Clinton with
eggs and Tomatoes when she went to tell them how to run their affairs. And the
Copts of Egypt told the American Evangelical pedophiles who offered to pay for
the construction of churches in Egypt
to get the f**k out of here, and never show their faces around this place
again.