When it comes to weinsteining somebody – whether they do it
themselves or they pick surrogates to do it for them – the Jews only manage to
weinstein American women, American men and their institutions. Every time they
try to pull a stunt of this nature on someone else, they get castrated.
Still, the Jews spent the last half century telling America 's
elites they are so big and so stiff, they can screw anyone they want and
they'll get away with it. Hell, they can even screw the whole world all at
once, and they'll get away with it. America
believed these charlatans because America loves to be flattered.
Then came Donald Trump who picked the hooker that screwed
the people of the state that elected her. He thought that Nikki Haley will be
perfect at representing America
to the world. He wanted her to be the face that will scare the world into
bending to his will. And so, he made her ambassador to the United Nations (UN)
and sent her to make the standard Jewish threat of taking the names of those
who would defy his decision on Jerusalem .
The instructions sounded so Jewish, she embraced them, absorbed them, and went
to regurgitate them at the feet of the UN delegates.
Absorbing what she is told is the natural state of this
woman. When you study her performance, you discover that she has no organic
matter between her ears. Instead, she has – in that cavity – an old fashioned
tape recorder in which the Jewish talking points (JTP) that were created during
the last half century were stored. Watch her respond to questions in any
interview, and you'll conclude she knows one hundred percent of the JTP, and
zero percent of anything else. In fact, she was programmed to rattle off the
Israeli points of view while getting paid by America .
And so, when the day of reckoning came, and the vote was
taken at the General Assembly of the UN, no one displayed the slightest sign of
fear. The delegates voted as dictated to by their conscience, and not in
accordance with the size or stiffness of America 's instrument of rape that
Haley had been lauding.
That day was December 21, 2017. Three days before that, on
December 18, 2017 the Security Council of the UN had held a vote on a
resolution condemning America's decision to move its embassy to Jerusalem.
Fourteen of the fifteen members voted for it, and America – the fifteenth member –
did what the Jews wanted Haley to do, which was to veto the resolution. This is
why the world moved to the General Assembly where it secured the Justice that was
due to the people of Palestine .
It happened on the same day that Benny Avni rushed to his
computer and complained in print about Britain 's
vote against America ,
which he considered a betrayal. In fact the column he wrote came under the
title: “Britain just
betrayed America
at the United Nations,” published on December 18, 2017 in the New York Post.
The column rests on what Avni says was a contradiction
committed by the British UN Ambassador Matthew Rycroft. To explain it, he set
the stage by saying that “Haley berated the UN members for their hypocrisy.
They complain that Trump prejudges final-status issues. [And yet] they rely on
the UN to weigh in on all kinds of issues regarding the Israeli-Palestinian
peacemaking”.
Haley's point was proven, says Avni, when the British
Ambassador first stated that the status of Jerusalem
should be determined through negotiations between the two parties, but then
saying that Jerusalem must ultimately be the
shared capital of Palestine and Israel . And so
Avni asks: “With these, what's left for Israelis and Palestinians to
negotiate?”
In making that statement, and asking that question, Benny
Avni has shown he was too young during the time that resolutions 242 and 338
were debated; and that he may be too busy now or too lazy to read up on the
subjects he writes about.
What he needs to know is that those resolutions established
a formula called “land for peace.” They are laws, and like any law, they spell
out conditions that must not be violated, and they allow for no other
conditions to be added.
A condition of those resolutions is to the effect that a
land swap will have to be negotiated between the parties. Another condition is
to the effect that Jerusalem
must remain an open city in the sense of being an international city.
That will necessitate negotiating the modality of troop
withdrawal from Jerusalem and the entire West Bank .