Why did America win the war against the two most formidable
war machines of the Second World War – Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan – but
was brought to a standstill by North Korea's ill equipped army a few years
later, and lost decisively to the ragtag army of North Vietnam a few more years
after that?
The reason is that America 's
involvement in World War II was an honest act that did not have to be labeled
self-defense, whereas America 's
operations against North Korea
and North Vietnam were
devious acts conducted under the false pretense of self-defense – meaning America 's
defense and that of its allies. It is that America
was attacked at Pearl Harbor by a Japan
that was already committing much evil in Asia ;
and called to help liberate a European continent that had succumbed to an evil
force it could not defeat by itself.
Realizing how much Britain
was diminished by the war, and seeing how America
had become a rising power, Britain 's
Winston Churchill incited America 's
leaders to prepare for a quixotic battle against an enemy that simply did not
exist in the aftermath of World War Two. Still, Churchill managed to instill in
the minds of the American leaders and their successors, the false impression
that a communist domino effect headed by the Soviet Union will sweep Asia and
the rest of the world, including America , which it wants to destroy.
This is why America
got involved in Korea
where the Chinese communists were helping the North in its effort to unify the
country. The same scenario was later repeated in Vietnam when the French said they
could not stop the anti-colonial revolutionary forces that were sweeping the
country. In both cases America
was under the illusion that the self-determination expressed by the people in
those places, constituted a threat to its own existence. And it was this belief
that caused America
to view its involvement in those countries as a war of self-defense. The thing
is that the American narrative remained the same even after the evidence came
out to the effect that such fears were baseless.
Thus, whereas North Korea
and North Vietnam adopted
the honest strategy of steadfast resistance, America
adopted the devious strategy of pretending to liberate and democratize the
people of the region when in fact it was fighting the Soviet
Union in accordance with Churchill's instructions. This is why America lost
big.
Now, decades later, that same scenario is repeating itself
in that America was called
upon to support the colonial aspirations of the Jews whose plan is to have Israel dominate the Middle
East . This struggle is still ongoing, and you can get a sense of
the effort that the Jews are putting into it by reading the editorial which
came in the Wall Street Journal under the title: “Iran's Syrian Front” and the
subtitle: “Assad's atrocities grow as Tehran builds a new anti-Israel
satellite.” It was published on February 22, 2018 in the Journal.
Replaying the role of Churchill who demagogued the Soviet
Union, the Jews are now demagoging Iran
and Russia .
And this is how they are doing it: “Iran ,
along with Russia
are largely responsible for the survival of [Assad's regime.] The trio will use
peace talks to re-establish Assad's control over Syria . Russia
will keep its military bases, and Iran
wants to establish a new imperial outpost on the border with Israel ”.
Thus, in the same way that America
helped liberate its European allies, the Jews have been trying to make it sound
like America and Israel were
allies in the fight against a common enemy that the Jews were never able to
clearly identify or even define. And so they stuck with the mantra that America and Israel
are friends, and that Israel
is facing an existential threat. The conclusion being that America must continually help Israel stay afloat; and when it gets into
trouble, America
must rush to rescue it.
The Jews are saying that this moment has come. Because they
called on America to help
many times before, and because their plea increasingly falls on deaf ears in Washington , they have now changed the way they call on America to
help. Their new approach uses a more subdued and subtle presentation. Mind you,
it is still a devious approach, but it's the only way they know how to get America
involved in a Middle Eastern war again.
Here is how the Wall Street Journal ends its editorial:
“If the Trump Administration is worried about the gathering
storm, you can't tell from its actions. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson toured
the region and called for a 'whole and independent Syria with no demarcations dividing
it.' Mr. Trump promised to work with allies to counter Iran 's 'support for proxies in the region,' but
the U.S.
has shown no strategy for doing so. Meanwhile, an Iran-Israel conflict grows
more likely by the day”.
With the use of the term “gathering storm” of “Shock and
Awe” fame; with the reminder that Tillerson is resisting the colonial project
of truncating Syria; with the reminder that Trump promised to work with allies
(such as Israel) but has not done so, and with the subtle blackmail that Israel
will start a war aimed at dragging America into it, the Jews of the Wall Street
Journal are hoping to duplicate the Churchill ruse of keeping it at war for
another three quarters of a century or longer.