Daniel Pipes wrote an article that shows how the Jews
exploit the weaknesses in the democratic system of governance to make the
American government work for Israel
by working against the interests of the American people. The article came under
the title: “Why the U.S.-Israel honeymoon may not last much longer,” published
in the Washington Times on February 5, 2018.
Imagine you have a magic wand you can use to make the things
that work for you irreversible, and those that work against you reversible. How
would you use the wand? Well, if you're a Jew in the Daniel Pipes mode, and
your preoccupation is to promote the interests of Israel ,
you make sure that no law of the United States
or the United Nations is passed that might harm Israel . Thus, whatever you
accomplish in this realm will look like a backstop mechanism whose purpose is
to prevent Israel
from sliding backward.
Well and good, but how will you make things work for Israel ? What
you do is take advantage of the need for normalcy that motivates people to act
the way they do. You prepare a subtle plan that is anything but normal, and
have the American Congress adopt it not knowing what you're up to. For your
trick to succeed, you breakup the plan into little pieces, each of which,
standing alone, appears harmless.
This done, you work on having the American Congress adopt
the pieces one at a time over an extended period of time. When all is said and
done, you'll have the parts of an engine that's ready to be assembled. When
completed, that engine will propel Israel 's interests forward. This
accomplishment, together with the backstop mechanism discussed earlier will
form your magic wand.
The Daniel Pipes article shows how one such plan is put
together. The writer sets the stage in his introductory paragraph with these
words: “President Trump took two steps favorable to Israel :
recognizing Jerusalem
as its capital and cutting funds to UNRWA.” He then says that both steps were
taken for the wrong reasons. Actually, this is a lie that conceals the trick he
is about to pull on the American Congress. The truth is that President Trump
took the two steps that he did for the reasons that Daniel Pipes and others
like him have been advancing for decades. But now that Israel ate its cake, Pipes wants Israel to keep
the Palestinian cake too.
To achieve that goal, Daniel Pipes pulls his trick in a
typically Jewish fashion. He portrays Israel as a victim for no better
reason than it was made to eat the cake. But using this false pretense as a
pretext, Pipes complains that eating the cake has caused three problems for Israel . He
describes those problems in a way that suggests what the solutions ought to be.
In fact, these are not real solutions but Trojan Horses he wants the Congress
to adopt. They hide inside them the parts of the machine that will propel Israel forward
at the expense of the American people.
Here is what Pipes says about the first problem:
Recognizing Jerusalem as Israel 's
capital has backfired. Instead of settling the issue, Jerusalem has attracted more attention than
ever before especially from the Muslim World and the Palestinians. Pipes wants
it known he fears that temperamental and spontaneous Trump may be tempted to
rescind the recognition. His message is clear. He wants the Congress to enact
legislation that will prohibit the President from rescinding the recognition no
matter what the Muslims or the Palestinians or the rest of the world think or
do or say.
Here is what Pipes says about the second problem:
At this time the Palestinians are angry at the Americans,
and they will not participate in any initiative endorsed by the United States .
Pipes fears that sooner or later, the Palestinians will want to deal with the
Americans again. When this happens, he predicts that President Trump will have
a fabulous gift for them. This means he will want to give them their cake,
something that the Israelis are hanging on like their dear life. And so, Daniel
Pipes wants the Congress to close that door on Trump and on the Palestinians.
Here is what Pipes says about the third problem: