Ever since the 1960s – two decades after the creation of Israel – the rabbis began their hard drive to
take over America .
They did so by pretending to defend themselves against the evil they said was
lurking out there, and by the same token, protecting America from the harm it fails to
see coming at it.
While the Jews were adept at confusing their American hosts
by uttering contradictory statements in one and the same breath, they proved
that they suffered from a serious problem. It was that they could not get
themselves in synch with the concept of time. This inability became obvious
when they attacked the Arab opposition to Israel 's
expansionist policies in the Middle East . They
did so by accusing the Palestinians of trying to turn the clock back 20 years;
to a time when Palestine
belonged to Palestinians.
The rabbis in charge of propaganda kept leveling that
accusation at the Palestinians by making the point that the latter should
resign themselves to the reality that the Jews have come back to the homeland
that was theirs 2000 years ago. But while in their view, looking 20 years into
the past was turning the clock back, looking 2000 years into the past was not
turning the clock back. And ever since that time, the Jews kept showing
themselves to be illiterate when it came to making sense of chronology.
While this is a serious handicap in itself, it adds to the
woes of the Jews by diminishing their ability to construct solid arguments that
remain valid past the moment they are uttered. An example of this Jewish
affliction is demonstrated in the editorial that came under the title: “Abbas
Abandons the Show” and the subtitle: “Rather than work for peace, the
Palestinian president walks out.” It was written by the editors of the Weekly
Standard and published on February 21, 2018.
The passage in the editorial that shows how severely
handicapped these people are, and shows that the handicap is a permanent
condition of the culture that animates them – goes like this: “Israel's
minister of education fired back: Abbas should focus not on building an
imaginary past, but rather on creating a practical future.” The Israeli
minister went on to say that “a nation inventing its past has no future”.
But what was it that caused the minister to fire back with
these words? Well, it was that the Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas was
responding to the Jewish claim that Jews of every race and every ethnic
background have the right to displace the Palestinians and take their properties
because the Hebrew nomads of antiquity adhered to the Jewish religion. They may
have crossed into Palestine
at one time or another looking for green pasture to feed their sheep. And so,
because there were Jews in the past and there are Jews today, Jewish logic
ascertains that Palestine
belongs to the Jews more than it does to the Palestinians.
The point that Abbas made in response was that the
Palestinians of today are the descendants of people that lived on the land 5000
years ago and never left the place. Given the long history of the region, given
that it gave birth to the three monotheistic religions, and given that
converting from one religion to another was a common occurrence throughout the
ages, ownership of the land cannot be determined by religion. Only the people
who lived there and never left the place are deemed to own it whether they are
Christians, Muslims or Jews.
The next thing that the editors of the Weekly Standard did
was attack Mr. Abbas for walking away after the conclusion of his speech
instead of staying to hear what the representatives of America and Israel had to say. This shows that
maybe the editors had no idea what they were commenting on. Maybe no one had
told them that Abbas asked for the Security Council to convene to let the world
know he was saying goodbye to American mediation, and was seeking an international
coalition to replace America .
If this were the case, why would he stay and listen to America ...
having said goodbye?
Or maybe there was another reason for the wrath of the
editors. To find out, we look at the attack they leveled against Abbas to see
if there is something there. The attack went like this:
“Abbas walked away from the table. He was [seen] having a
photo taken with the Belgian foreign minister. If he compromises on the 'right
of return'––the idea that Palestinians can [return] to the land from which they
[were pushed out], thus obliterating the Israeli state––he will be deposed by
political adversaries”.
And there lies the clue which explains the wrath of the
editors. It is that the right of return for the Palestinians is gaining
traction among the Europeans – the proof being that after his speech, Abbas
stood beside the top diplomat of Belgium
where Brussels ,
the capital of the European Union, is located.