Having dragged America into the cesspool of endless Jewish
bad advice, the Tel-Aviv/New-York axis of the Pax-Judaica/Pax-Americana global
calamity is beginning to look shaky.
This reality has prompted the Bibi of Israel to run to
Moscow at every occasion where he begged Vladimir Putin to forgive the Jews for
what they did to hurt the interests of the Soviet Union –– and later those of
Russia –– in the American Congress of know-nothing nincompoops.
The Jews did it by taking advantage of the state to which
the Congress had sunk; brought down by years of degradation imposed by the
termite-like activities of the Jewish parasites that invaded it. These
parasitic moles covered the place with confusion, pitted the political parties
against each other, incited the members to attack one another, and decreed that
everybody must love the Jews, always the Jews and no one but the Jews. And so,
they turned the superpower into a hollowed-out hulk.
The unforeseen side-effect has been the reduction of Israel
itself from the artificial whale-like appearance it had enjoyed for a while, to
the minnow-like appearance it always was. Unable to pump hot air back into the
Israeli blimp, mamma Michelle Dunne, who adopted Israel as its own child,
panicked. Realizing that she can never make Israel look like a giant balloon
again, she hit on the idea of making Israel's big neighbor look very small to
make Israel look big by comparison.
And so, Michelle Dunne teamed up with Andrew Miller to
co-write: “Losing Egypt to Russia Isn't the Real Problem––but Collapse Is,” the
title of an article that also came under the subtitle: “Cairo is no long[er] a
prize to be won, but a weak state in need of reform.” It was published on July
20, 2018 in The National Interest. Having tried a similar stunt once before,
and making the mistake of talking economics, a field in which she is as bad as
the Bibi can be when faking intellectual honesty, Michelle Dunne avoided the
subject this time.
Instead of economics, she made a sweep of every aspect of
statehood that she and her writing sidekick could think of. Having a long list
on hand, they attacked Egypt directly on some of those aspects, attacked the
country indirectly on other aspects, and pooh-poohed Egypt's ability to be
useful to America in everything else. When you put all that together, it sounds
as follows:
“We have doubts as to whether the
Egyptian military is prepared to switch from Western to Russian patronage. We
question whether Egypt is a critical military ally to the United States. But
what if the relationship did fall apart? On a practical level, the impact on
U.S. interests would be minimal. The Egyptian state is less capable than it
was, and its military a poor reflection of the force that did well in 1973.
Power in the region has shifted to the Gulf, while other Arab countries have
eclipsed Egypt in human development. While Trump believes Egypt is key to
Israeli-Palestinian peace, neither Netanyahu nor Abbas is likely to move off
avowed redlines at Sisi's request. Egypt will still allow U.S. ships access to
the Suez Canal. As to overflight and landing rights to U.S. military aircraft, they are less valuable
than before. The danger is that Egypt could sink into obscurity or state
failure due to poor governance. Egypt is no
longer a strategic prize for the United States. It is a challenge to be managed
through coercive diplomacy”.
The two clowns have managed to pack not one message in their
article, but two of them. The first is that Egypt has become so small, everyone
else in the neighborhood looks big by comparison, including Israel. The second
message is that if left alone, Egypt will collapse and create serious problems
in the region. For this reason, Miller and Dunne are recommending that America
act to fix the situation ... not by handling Egypt with kid gloves but using
coercive methods.
Even if someone didn't know that Michelle Dunne made a
career weeping the sad song which says: “the end is near for Egypt,” and
calling on America to force that country into emulating America's Congress of
nincompoops to save it from the collapse that hasn't come in seven thousand
years, is there any indication in the article that shows how wrong Dunne and
her sidekick are? The answer is yes; and here is the passage that shows it:
“The Egyptian-Russian cooperation
needs to be seen in a broader context. Egypt is not seeking to replace the U.S.
but rather to supplement it with Russian support. Egypt has sought to return to
a more independent foreign policy. Egypt no more wants to be dependent on
Russia than it wants to be dependent on the U.S. Moreover, Sisi has sought to
expand defense and commercial ties with Germany and France as avidly as with
Russia”.
The truth is that the Egyptian
economy is firing on all cylinders, scoring a growth rate of between 5.5 and 6
percent, quarter after quarter. Investors from around the world are flocking to
Egypt loaded with oodles of money to invest in a country that is fast becoming
the economic miracle of the future as far as the eye can see.
Since Michelle Dunne and all those
like her –– totally ignorant of economic matters but anxious to detect signs
that growth has plateaued in Egypt, if only temporarily –– let me help them.
They'll know that growth has plateaued when they see what is called “hot money”
come into the country.