A peculiarity of the human psyche is that we abhor missing
anything in life. This means we want to be fully satisfied at every moment.
Thus, if we believe that something is missing in the way that we live, we
imagine being immersed in a void. And so, we try to fill that void even if it
costs us a lifetime of failed attempts.
And that's not all there is to the peculiarity of our
psyche. Another aspect is that if we manage to fill the void we have imagined,
our imagination will create another void, and we'll spend time and effort
trying to fill this one too. Moreover, when we run out of ideas as to what else
we may be missing, we look to our neighbor for the sake of imagining that “the
other man's grass is greener,” thus get wound up about missing something.
This game does not always play itself out serenely. It is
apt – once in a while – to generate motivation that can get out of hand. If
this happens to someone that doesn't have the moral fiber to push back against
temptation, they run the risk of taking from others what they feel they must
have. And the way they do that spans the gamut from embezzlement to armed
robbery.
What may come as a surprise to the reader is that such
behavior does not involve only the poor or the downtrodden. In fact, a poor man
may steal only one loaf of bread when he could steal two because one loaf is
all he needs to appease his hunger. By contrast, a man that may be wealthy
enough to buy himself an empire, is prone to engage in unlimited shady
business, not because he desperately needs to nourish his body, but because he
wishes to build an empire that will eclipse that of his neighbor.
It can also happen that when someone has reached that level
of power and wealth, he begins to develop paranoia. He projects onto others the
intense desire he sees in himself for having something they don't have, thus
lives in fear that they will come to take from him what he has and they don't.
When someone has reached this level of delusion, he is liable to use violent
means to defend himself against a threat that may not exist.
If this scenario is difficult to fathom among individuals,
it's not difficult to see it develop among nations. In fact, it was the
development of such sentiments that caused America to see a domino situation
unfold around Vietnam. It is what caused America to see Iraqi nuclear mushrooms
fill its skies. It is also what's causing America to imagine Iranian mushrooms
fill the skies everywhere in the world.
What must be said, however, is that left to its devices,
America would probably not have developed such sentiments. Having responded to
Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor with two nuclear bombs over Japanese cities and
having won decisive victories during the Second World War, the Americans were
in a magnanimous mood.
But as a nation that grew too powerful too fast, America
also developed a complex of inferiority with regard to its knowledge of foreign
affairs. And so, the older nations of Europe took advantage of the situation
and convinced America to do the dirty work for them. They got the giant to
start the Cold War against the Soviet Union; and got it involved in several
South East Asian hot wars.
But after a while, the old European powers saw the folly in
what they were doing and backtracked. In so doing they created a kind a vacuum
that the Jews were happy to fill. They came with their own agenda and used
America to implement it for them. To this end, the Jews pitted America against
the Arab/Muslim world, and when the sparks started to fly all over the region,
the Jews collected the spoils.
Not only did the Jews abuse America's power and prestige,
they used its relation with the NATO nations to abuse those nations as well.
This happened every time that America used the NATO bases and/or personnel to
launch air and/or naval attacks against an Arab or Muslim country.
The Jews are still trying to abuse America and its NATO
allies as you can see in two editorials that appeared in the Wall Street
Journal on July 24 and 26, 2018. The first came under the title: “Pompeo's Iran
Truth-Telling” and the subtitle: “The President's tweet distracts from a better
speech.” The second editorial came under the title: “Europe's Iran Options,”
and the subtitle: “Instead of digging in on a bad deal, try to negotiate a
better one”.
On the 24th of July, the editors of the Journal advised
President Donald Trump that more effective “than blustery tweets” is the case
that Pompeo and Haley are laying out for dealing with Israel's number one
nemesis, Iran.
On the 26th of July, the Jews advised the Europeans that they
should “focus their diplomacy on securing a pact that truly restricts Tehran”.