What's the difference between the enlightened and rational
people, and the callow and confused people?
The difference can be explained by comparing the following
two examples:
First, delegates from around the world gather at the UN
Human Rights Council. Most of them see the world as it is, describe it the way
they see it, draw conclusions that enjoy the support of the majority, formulate
policies accordingly and implement them the best they can. These are the enlightened
and rational people.
Second, a couple of those delegates see the world through
the prism of their fantasy, describe a setting that does not exist, draw false
conclusions that enjoy no one's support, and try to implement policies that rub
salt in the wounds of the already victimized. These are the callow and confused
people.
The people in the first category are ordinary human beings
living everywhere on Planet Earth, including America and a few places in
Israel. But how do you know they are enlightened and rational people? You know
they are because if you ask them: What do you call the presence of Israeli
troops in Palestine? They answer: we call it the occupation of Palestine by the
regime that's governing in Israel.
As to the people in the second category, they are
politicians of the so-called democracies, as well as their master puppeteers
and confused followers. Their thinking is not shaped by the principle of the
moral life, or even the mundane life. Rather, their thinking is shaped by the need
to sell their soul to the highest bidder in the hope this will help them get
elected. If you ask them whether or not they consider the presence of Israeli
troops in Palestine an occupation, they protest that you dare asking such
question, and accuse you of antisemitism.
The enlightened and rational delegates at the UN Human
Rights Council have no illusions about the state of the human condition. They
see horror committed by people against people in Latin America, Asia, the
Middle East, the United States of America, Europe and just about everywhere in
the world. None of them claims to be “holier than thou” and so, they all work
together for the common good. They tell of their own shortcomings, compare them
with those of others, debate possible solutions and pledge to do the best they
can to improve the situation for those who suffer. And they do make progress
year after year.
While this is happening, the only place where demonic horror
is committed by one kind of people (Jews) against another kind of people
(Christians and Muslims) is Israel where the government implements a long range
genocidal policy, deliberately disguised as apartheid so that critics talk
about the apparent apartheid instead of talking about the reality of genocide.
As to the place where the rulers of Israel find support and encouragement; it
is among the American politicians who promise to sell their souls if elected,
and deliver when they are.
That demonic behavior is not something peculiar to modern
Jews. It has been their legacy since ancient times; the reason why they
suffered hugely throughout time, everywhere they went on the planet. Their
behavioral pattern never changes, thus remains predictable. They get into a new
community; they do well initially, and when people discover what they are up
to, seek to solution them out of existence. Thus, the nagging question: Why can
they not see it coming, and stop doing what they do?
You get an answer to this question when you go over the
article that came under the title: “Moral clarity becomes a casualty of the
need to placate tyrants,” an article that was written by Ed Feulner and
published on July 23, 2018 in The Washington Times. What you'll see throughout
the article is an Alice in Wonderland sort of situation where everything is
turned upside down.
What follows is a condensed version of what Ed Feulner has
written about the speech that Nikki Haley gave at The Heritage Foundation with
regard to America's decision to quit the UN Human Rights Council:
“We've seen the Council allow membership to some abusers
while criticizing Israel. And so Nikki Haley came to The Heritage Foundation to
elaborate on the reasons the U.S. withdrew from the Council. The U.N. was
founded to promote peace and security based on justice, equal rights, and the
self-determination of people, Ms. Haley pointed out. Unfortunately, thanks to
the presence of some members, it falls short of this goal. The result?
Well-meaning members adopt a position of neutrality. Today, the Council
includes some of the worst human rights violators – Cuba, China and Venezuela
have seats on the Council, Ms. Haley said. It targets Israel and seats the
Congo. When Venezuelan Nicholas Maduro spoke to the Council, he got a standing
ovation. Ms. Haley said many share our disgust at the Council's record, but
they will say so only in private. They're afraid to speak up. We withdrew from
the Council because we disliked its hypocrisy. The U.S. will continue to pursue
its human rights outside the Council. We're not going to remain in it because
we have a conscience”.
While Nikki Haley was reminding the audience that the
purpose of the UN is to promote peace and security based on justice, equal
rights and the self determination of people, she advocated kicking out of the
Council, countries like Cuba, China and Venezuela, countries that exert
herculean efforts to give their people the good things the UN says everyone
must have.
And while advocating kicking the good people out of the
Council, Nikki Haley wants the world to admire Israel, the only neocolonialist
entity that is occupying someone else's country, depriving millions of
Palestinians of peace and security based on justice, equal rights, and the
chance to determine their own destiny.