In civilized cultures, a dispute between two parties leads one to
accuse the other of wrong doing. The goal of the accuser is to obtain a verdict
that will show his accusation has merit. He could seek redress and compensation
for damages he might claim he incurred.
The road that takes the litigants from the accusation to the
verdict, is called trial. It is a procedure during which the prosecution
presents its case and the defense rebuts it point by point. This is done with
each side challenging the other in a complex exchange called cross-examination.
Its purpose is to sift through the verbiage and come out with the truth, pure
and simple. When this is done, and the truth that cannot be refuted is brought
out, a judge or jury pronounces a verdict that all concerned must then accept.
That's how it happens in civilized cultures. It was the way it
used to happen in America both in the courtrooms of the nation, as well as the
domain of public opinion. It continues to happen this way in the courtrooms of
America, and generally speaking, in the court of public opinion as well. But
there is an exception to this rule. It is that when it comes to Israeli
matters, nothing is debated in the two public places where such matters count
the most: The media and the Congress.
This is where Israeli issues go from accusation to verdict, or
from proposition to disposition without airing the particulars of the case in a
setup that looks like a courtroom trial or a public debate. Stated simply, what
is practiced in these two forums with regard to Israeli matters, is done in the
dark of night and behind closed doors. It is a form of Stone Age fascism the
likes of which Planet Earth has never seen before.
You can see an example of how this primitive form of governance
continues to inject itself into a society as advanced as America, and how it
spreads in all its institutions. It is happening to America even if the latter
knows it is suffering from an acute case; one that's known to most people as
the Jewish disease. The example referred to above, is an article that came
under the title: “Anti-Semitism goes mainstream,” written by Sean Durns, and
published on May 21, 2019 in The Washington Examiner.
Instead of recognizing the reality that to have exempted Jewish
and Israeli matters from following the normal procedure, was a mistake that's
being remedied at long last, the writer has called the remedy a virus. In fact,
this is how he started his discussion: “Anti-Semitism is a highly mutable
mental virus that infects cultures, movements, ideologies and religions.” He
went on to complain: “Anti-Semitism is spreading into the bloodstream of
mainstream America. Key institutions are helping to transmit the virus”.
To expand on his theory, Sean Durns zeroed in on three people, two
women and a man, each operating within the confines of a different set of
circumstances. They were accused of committing infractions of the antisemitic
kind, and Durns set out to show how they were treated under the existing Jewish
setup. Whether by coincidence or by design, the two women were given a similar
kind of treatment, whereas the man was given a different treatment.
To fully understand what happened, the existing Jewish setup must
be explained in more detail. It operates under the principle that, to go from
accusation to verdict or from proposition to disposition, you drop the public
debate that would have served as cross-examination. What you do instead, is
pressure the defendant, under a regime of blackmail if necessary, to apologize.
This is a potent trick whose outcome is always as good as a self-imposed guilty
verdict. This, in fact, is the Jewish invention that did away with public
debates concerning Jewish and Israeli matters.
It is what happened to the two women, Ilhan Omar who is a
representative in the Federal Legislature of the United States, and Valerie
Plame, who was a CIA officer –– both of whom had tweeted opinions deemed by the
Jewish establishment to be antisemitic. They were pressured to apologize, and
they did.
As to the male defendant, Omar Suleiman, who did not apologize, he
was given the alternative Jewish treatment. In addition to being accused of
antisemitism and deprived of the chance to defend himself in a public debate
facing his accusers, he was further accused––behind his back––of supporting
terrorism.
In fact, accusing those who refuse to apologize, of being
terrorists or supporting terrorism, is the newest of the Jewish inventions. Its
intended effect is to inflict countless damaging consequences on the accused,
both in the social and political spheres.
Here is how, in condensed form, Sean Durns ends his article:
“The silence of those in the media is dangerous. History tells us
that institutions are essential to a functioning democracy. It also says that
anti-Semitism is a sign of the impending collapse of liberal values. America's
institutions must do a better job at safeguarding against anti-Semitism”.
If you cannot see the morbid irony in those words, you're probably
a Jew or a sympathizer. The reality is that America always had strong
institutions. But they were infiltrated by Jews, and turned into
termite-infested hulks just about ready to collapse.
To assert that anti-Semitism portends the collapse of liberal
values, is to engage in twisted logic. The reality is that both anti-Semitism
and the collapse of liberal values, have one and the same set of roots.
They are the Jewish infiltration of the institutions, and their
transformation into instruments dedicated to serve Jewish causes, including
Israel … and no one else.