Thursday, May 23, 2019

The Imperatives that beget more Imperatives

No war ever happened without the imperative that caused it. The problem is that there have been very few legitimate imperatives to necessitate a war, and a whole lot of phony imperatives to trigger one.

Whether legitimate or phony, the reasons that have led to a war most of the time, can be classified as follows: religious differences, colonial intent, liberation from colonial oppression, supremacist beliefs, ideological differences, personal vendetta, and perhaps a few more minor reasons.

Right now, we have the ongoing case of Palestine-cum-Israel and the occupied territories where the Jews are conducting a colonial/supremacist war that is resisted by a Palestinian war of liberation. Because the Jews, who operate under the banner of the Israeli flag, could not sustain their aggression without the massive help they receive from America, they disguise their operations as ideologically motivated.

That is how the Jews keep America on their side –– a superpower whose self-imposed preoccupation since the second world war, has been to subdue the rise of political systems that differ from the Liberal Democracy it has adopted.

Beside the violent operations that were instigated by America or by Israel since the Second World War, there have been a number of smaller ones, all of which amounted to only a small fraction of the misery the world has witnessed. This says that all of what's happening today in terms of wars or preparation for war, fall under the purview of America, as well as the Jews who use America to benefit Israel and reward themselves.

Much of what's happening today can be traced back to the advice that Winston Churchill gave to America at the end of the Second World War. What he did in essence, was tell the Americans that the Soviet Union will spread the Communist ideology throughout the world unless it is contained. Upon that counsel, the Americans embarked on a program to circle the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies with military bases manned by American troops and those of its NATO allies.

Prompted by the imperative to defend its people from the danger of an America that was tightening the noose around its neck, the Soviet Union embarked on a program of military preparedness to match that of America and its allies. This necessitated the institution of an accelerated R&D program in weapon systems that became ever more lethal with each new generation of weapons.

What developed eventually, was that the imperative to keep up with the progress made by the other side, caused America and the Soviet Union to adopt an arms race that forced third parties to join the madness. Thus, France developed its own nuclear arsenal, and so did China. In turn, India that was frightened by China, joined the race and developed its own nuclear arsenal. As well, Pakistan that got frightened by India's bomb, joined the race and developed its own arsenal.

Because a doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) imposed itself on the world, an uneasy balance was maintained. It did away with the idea of petty wars motivated by religion, ideological differences or personal vendetta. However, the Jews who were developing big dreams of their own, managed to normalize their supremacist ideology. This done, they took up the baton from where Churchill had left it, and turned their dream into a colonial expansionist movement they called Pax Americana.

To make the movement work for them and for Israel, the Jews used America's power to implement it. This caused Israel's neighbors to keep up with the armament that America has been supplying to Israel. It is how the arms race that started with NATO and the Warsaw Pact, was transferred to the East Asian nations, and thanks to the Jews, transferred to the Middle East, though not yet countenancing nuclear weapons. It is, however, the sad and endless story of the imperatives that beget more imperatives.

To see how the Jews go about maintaining this global misery, you should read Clifford D. May's column that came under the title: “The imperative of deterrence,” published on May 21, 2019 in The Washington Times.

What follows is the passage that shows how the Jewish influence, working on America's leaders, keeps the planet from scoring a happy ending, and shedding its misery once and for all:

“Evidence suggesting that Iran was planning to strike American targets came to the attention of the US. In response, Mr. Trump deployed defensive and offensive military assets to the region. He is sending a message that a price will be paid should Iran or its proxies harm Americans. One way to measure power is to ask: Who deters whom? Had the US response been less robust, Iran would have doubted American resolve … The hysteria of those who oppose standing up to aggression has convinced Iran that while Trump may prefer the conflict not go kinetic, he might –– in response to their killing Americans –– decide that he can indeed do a damn thing”.

Whichever way that thing started in the past, it ended up being a creeping involvement in the Jewish-inspired never-ending American war in the Middle East.