Michael Goodwin wrote a column, which he ended by proposing this
conclusion: “So many people hate Israel because so many people hate Jews”.
Well, if you modify that saying to read: “People hate Israel
because of what Jews do,” you would make a great deal more sense because, as
time passes, Israel proves to be the sort of abhorrent if not hateful thing
that Jews do repeatedly.
A great deal more insight can be drawn from Michael Goodwin's
column, which came under the title: “Anti-Semitic scandal at the New York Times
isn't surprising,” published on April 30, 2019 in the New York Post.
You can see at the start of the column why Goodwin reached the
conclusion that he did while missing the point that people hate Jews because of
what they do, not because of who they are. After all, people have welcomed Jews
in their midst throughout time and space till they discovered what the Jews
were doing that was abhorrent and so, turned against them each time.
Here is a short collage of Michael Goodwin's own words that show
why he missed all of that: “...how the bone-headed decision was made? It's your
agenda, stupid.” That is, Goodwin is accusing the New York Times of harboring a
baseless kind of hatred for Jews that is supernatural in nature, therefore
changeless. This being the case, he and all those like him, dismiss the idea
that Jews can solve their age-old problem by altering their behavior.
So we ask: What is the most loathsome Jewish behavior that causes
the bile of ordinary human beings to boil over; to force on them the necessity
to put an end to that behavior and at times, end the life of the Jews that
immerse themselves in such behavior? Well, that loathsome behavior can be
described as follows: The Jews publicly stage the theatrics of the democratic
game by pretending to give-and-take with you, while at the same time engaging
other people behind your back, and have them set-up for the tyrannical game of
kneecapping you the moment you appear to win the competition.
When it comes to the game of politics and diplomacy, those whom
the Jews engage behind your back are the influential and power wielding
individuals in government and in other important institutions.
Playing the political game, the Jews collect dirt on these people,
entrap them and blackmail them till they have them where they want them. They
tell them how to impose the Jews on their own people, which they do lest they
be unmasked publicly. Having the Jews shoved down their throats causes the
public's rage to build. When it reaches the boiling point, the people take
matters in their own hands and torch the Jews where they find them. It happened
everywhere, and all the time.
As to playing the diplomatic game, the best way to explain what
transpires in this domain, is to write a fictional scenario that will highlight
the truth better than any narration can. To that end, we call “Devil” the
Jewish American who pretends to be the impartial mediator that's engaged to
bring the Palestinians and the Israelis to negotiate an equitable deal, and end
their dispute.
The Devil begins by asking the Palestinians what they want. They
say they want (1) A two-state solution so as to end the occupation, (2) East
Jerusalem as their capital and (3) The right of return for those who wish to go
back to their stolen properties ... or adequate compensation if that cannot be
done.
The Devil goes to the Israelis and asks them what they want. They
say what they want is simple. They want to negotiate with the Palestinians,
except that the Palestinians are not serious because they say they want a
two-state solution, East Jerusalem, and the right of return. As long as they
take this stance, there is nothing to negotiate. But if America will say we
take off the table the two-state solution, East Jerusalem and the right of
return, there will be no more bones of contention between the two sides, and
negotiations can proceed without rancor.
The Devil takes that message to the Palestinians who then ask:
What is there to negotiate, if what we want to negotiate about is taken off the
table before the start of the negotiations?
And the Devil says: as a matter of fact, the Jews told me what you
can negotiate about. You can talk about how much tax the Jews will collect from
your people. How much water and electricity they will sell you. What you must
do to make sure none of your youngsters will violate the security of Israel,
and so on and so forth.
There are lots of choices to be made, and the Palestinian
Authority can make them as freely as it wants to.
And the Palestinians respond that they heard all of that before.
It boils down to the Jew telling the Palestinian interlocutor: You are free to
choose what you want. Either I rape your wife 4 times a week, and your daughter
3 times. Or I rape your wife 3 times a week, and your daughter 4 times.
It is entirely up to you to decide which is more convenient. So
tell me, oh difficult Palestinian! What is it that you choose? And the
Palestinian looks at the Devil and says: Go to hell from where you came, and
don't ever show your face around here again.
Well, my friend, what you should expect to see over the next month
before the unveiling of the Devil's new plan, is not an honest debate that pits
Jewish absurdities against Palestinian rights, but a cooperation between the
Devil, the Israelis, and the Jewish mob of pundits in America.