It is poignant but understandable to see
someone in distress suck up to someone more powerful. It is disgusting and
incomprehensible to see someone that's not in distress suck up to someone more
powerful.
It is insulting to see the leader of your
country subordinate himself to that of a bigger and more powerful country. It
is revolting to be an American and see your president subordinate himself to
what most Americans consider the lesser president of Russia. In fact, this was
a scene that played out in public not long ago. It forces the following
question: What link in the chain of American culture is so weak as to threaten
the demise of that culture? There may be an answer to that question in what the
Jews have discovered about America.
It took the Jews little time to discover
that in America, they could do what they never could anywhere else in thousands
of years. That is, they could participate in a gambling round, going in with an
empty hand, and yet win the jackpot without even bluffing their way with a
poker face. They could do it simply by staging scenes of theatrics that invoke
both the pathos of victimhood and the intimidation of the mystical.
An example of this has played itself not
long ago. It happened when The New York Times was made to apologize for a wrong
it did not do. What happened was that the paper published a totally innocuous
cartoon; one that treated a Jewish theme. Because the cartoon's message was
neutral instead of praising something Jewish or Israeli, the mob of Jewish
pundits let out a diarrhea of moaning, mixing it with the mystical predictions
of dire consequences that will follow if The New York Times did not apologize.
A few days later, The New York Times apologized.
It happened on April 30, 2019 that the
editors of The New York Times published their apology under the title: “A
Rising Tide of Anti-Semitism,” and the subtitle: “By publishing a bigoted
cartoon, The Times ignored the lessons of history, including its own.” Here is
how the editors described the cartoon: “It portrayed Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu of Israel as a dog wearing a Star of David on a collar. He was
leading President Trump, drawn as a blind man wearing a skullcap”.
Nothing in that cartoon is so unusual that
you can say it did not happen before. For example, Britain's former Prime
Minister, Tony Blair was often portrayed as Bill Clinton's lapdog. And nothing
bad happened to him or to Britain. No matter who drew the cartoon and no matter
where it was published, there was always something in the drawing that
identified Blair as British, and Clinton as American. Thus, it was not unusual
for Netanyahu to be wearing the Star of David in The Times cartoon. As to Trump
wearing a skullcap, that too was not unusual, given that Netanyahu always
bragged that he got Trump to do what was good for Israel and for the Jews … and
each time, Donald Trump proved Netanyahu to be correct.
But to read what the mob of Jewish pundits
has been saying, and read the Times response, you would think that, left
without an apology, the cartoon will motivate masses of Americans to arm
themselves with sticks, and go out at night, rampaging in Jewish neighborhoods,
breaking crystals and calling for a final solution. It is how the Jewish mob of
pundits has described what might happen, to justify hollering their pain of
victimhood, and warn that mysterious consequences will most certainly follow.
Another passage in the apology of The New
York Times tells how far down the realm of frightened hypnosis, the theatrics
of the Jewish mob of pundits, has sent the editors of that publication. Here is
that passage:
“A particularly frightening, and also
historically resonant, aspect of the rise of anti-Semitism in recent years is that
it has come from both the right and left sides of the political spectrum. Both
right-wing and left-wing politicians have traded in incendiary tropes, like the
ideas that Jews secretly control the financial system or politicians”.
No. That's a big lie. The politicians did
not accuse the Jews of controlling the financial system and politicians in
secret. The politicians do it openly because the Jews themselves do it openly
now. There was a time when saying as little as the Jews control Hollywood would
banish you from the scene and kill your career. And then the Jews became so
confident that they wrote a book with a title that proudly admits they control
Hollywood, adding: So what! As to the control of the financial system and
politicians, the Jews brag about it each time that one of their own is
appointed to the Fed, the World Bank or a similar institution.
As to the control of the politicians who
prostitute themselves; the politicians themselves do it in the open when they
visit Israel during an election campaign or promise that if elected, the first
thing they will do, is call Netanyahu.
They don't say why they would do this, but
the American people are made to understand that a better job (BJ) can be done
in Tel Aviv than New York.