Imagine the Titanic hitting an iceberg, it is taking-in water,
everyone knows that it will sink, but nobody knows how much time they have
left.
The ship's cook comes along and tells the passengers to set-up the
chairs on the deck because he plans to cook a nice meal for them –– perhaps the
last meal they'll ever have. And he wants them to enjoy the good time they have
left before going down with the ship.
As it happens, the name of the ship's cook is Steven A. Cook, who
wrote: “Israel Is at Peace (With Itself,)” the title of an article that also
came under the subtitle: “The country can't form a government, its peace
process is permanently stalled––and things have never been better.” It was
printed on June 12, 2019 on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Do you remember a time when the mighty Jewish propaganda machine
(of which Steven Cook was one big cog) used to paint the Middle East as a
jungle that was full of unreliable, flaky characters and flaky states you
couldn't do business with because you couldn't partner with them on any
project? Also, do you remember that in this jungle, Israel was represented as
an oasis of beauty and serenity where everything ran with the precision and
elegance of a Swiss watch?
Well, my friend, like every big lie, that portrait of the Middle
East was shattered like a painting that was drawn not on a canvass of fabric,
but a pane of glass. Let it also be known that the purpose for drawing the phony
portrait in the first place, was to argue that America's generous help to
Israel was the factor that made it possible to bring sanity to a Middle East ––
a place that never saw sanity before. The intent of all that, was to argue that
the aid to Israel must continue as generously as ever, if not increased.
The big lie has now been exposed. We get a true sense of its size
when we compare the way that the three main characters who are featured in the
drama of the region, were portrayed before the shattering of the portrait, and
the way the characters turned out to be in real life, as seen after the
shattering.
Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority, who was
portrayed as a stubborn and primitive individual, turned out to be a dignified
and well refined gentleman who would not bend his lofty principles no matter
how much America tried to bribe him, Israel tried to scare him, and both tried
to blackmail him.
Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, who was portrayed as
a crafty political operator, turned out to be a sleazy, double-faced player of
shell games who conned his American benefactors into believing that he was
running a democratic country when in fact, he was using democracy like a game
of the “now you see it and now you don't” kind. While he made big hay saying he
had no Palestinian partner with whom to negotiate peace, he proved to be no
more a partner with whom to negotiate anything, than a zoo monkey that was
deprived of nuts and bananas for three days.
As to America, recent events have shown that the entire Washington
Beltway was run and continues to be run by a bunch of bestial urban hillbillies
who inherited a wealthy country and squander its fortunes taking advice from
the likes of Netanyahu and other Jews.
Now that the world is looking at the shattered portrait of Israel,
Steven Cook is trying to spin the hard-to-hide facts which have emerged, the
way that Jews haggle their way out of a tight situation. He is doing it with a
fake comparison. Let me first give a typical example of how the Jews play this
game generally:
If you say America needs to spend a billion dollars to help settle
Muslim refugees in Europe, they'll argue: Do you know how many derelict bridges
you can fix in America with a billion dollars? On the other hand, if you say
that giving Israel 38 billion dollars is a big waste of money, they'll argue:
Do you realize what a small amount 38 billion dollars is, compared to America's
21 trillion dollars GDP? And if you say that squandering 7 trillion dollars killing
innocent Muslims is unethical, they'll argue: It is better to fight them over
there than fight them over here. The idea is that the Jews have a thin
one-liner for every observation, and nothing more profound than a Jewish
promise to honor their word.