Look at the following montage of quotes and try to determine
what's being attempted here:
“Is America experiencing Europe's growing anti-Semitism? The
climate has changed. Hatred has begun rearing its ugly head. Europe has a
problem with anti-Semitism. Should we expect things here to follow a European
trajectory? Americans recognize the threat not just to Jews, but to our
country. Republicans are working to force a vote, allowing governments to avoid
contracting with firms that support BDS”.
If you're a novice to the subject, you may be confused. If you're
somewhat familiar with the subject, you'll see many things attempted at the
same time. If you're old enough to remember how it all started decades ago,
you'll focus on how it has evolved, and be alarmed as to how far someone is
pushing a worrisome trend.
You'll get a deeper understanding of what this is about when you
read the article from which that montage was excerpted. The article came under
the title: “Is America Experiencing Europe's Growing Anti-Semitism?” and the
subtitle: “It all started on the campuses, and we did nothing because they were
students. We did nothing when they joined the party because it was just the
left-wing fringe, and now they've taken over.” It was written by Melissa
Langsam Braunstein and published on June 10, 2019 in The Federalist.
This whole thing is about the natural human rejection of what the
Jewish leaders are trying to accomplish, and how they go about doing it. The
reality of this matter is no more complicated than that. What is confusing the
subject, however, is that it was misnamed “anti-Semitism,” and was given
mysterious qualities of longevity that allow it to rise from its ashes like a
mythical bird that never dies.
After the defeat of the Nazis, after the Holocaust, after the
Second World War, after the mass immigration of Jews into America, and after
the creation of Israel by the United Nations, Jews were treated like anyone
else around the world, and treated like VIPs in Western Europe and America.
They were praised for the good things they did, but also rebuked for the bad
thing they did. And that's when the Jewish leaders objected.
The Jews wanted to be seen as immaculate and treated as infallible.
They wanted to command, and their word treated like dogma. On the surface, this
may sound like the desire of a 4-year old brat. But the Jewish leaders had a
long-term strategy behind their game. What they did was turn the sympathy they
had acquired as a result of the Holocaust, into a powerful engine. And like a
train of infinite length, they had the engine pull boxcar after boxcar, each
filled with endless demands.
The Jewish leaders began with the notion that anti-Semitism is
what led to the Holocaust. To avoid another holocaust from happening, said the
Jews, we must never allow anti-Semitism from rising again. From then on, the
accusation of anti-Semitism became the engine that pulled the boxcars of Jewish
demands. And this is how the devilish scheme was made to work:
Armed with the accusation of anti-Semitism, Jewish leaders of the
Alan Dershowitz kind purged academia of its non-compliant professors. Jewish
organizations of the anti-defamation type purged the media and the political
scene of their non-compliant operators. This done, there remained one more
thing to do for the Jewish leaders to acquire unprecedented dictatorial powers.
It was to “educate” the public on how to talk about Jews. The most notorious
example in this realm went like this: You are anti-Semitic and condemned if you
observe that Jews control Hollywood. You are a lover of Jews and commended if
you say Jews control Hollywood, and that's a good thing.
In other words, the Jews created a system according to which you
can report an observation about them only if you couple your report with your
approval of what you see. That's because you never know who in the audience may
not like what you are reporting. To make sure that you don't inadvertently
contribute to a disapproval of a Jewish action, you must preemptively approve
of it. If you fail to do so, you'll be considered antisemitic, and condemned to
disappear from the public square.
Because there is much to remember in the boxcars of the Jewish
train of demands, the best thing to do is to stay on the safe side, say the
Jews. That is, don't debate Jewish subjects in the media or the Congress.
Instead, whisper your ideas under a regime of “radio silence.” If you're in
journalism, publish only glowing reports about the Jews and Israel. If you're a
legislator, enact into law what the Jews whisper in your year.
This is why Melissa Braunstein has written approvingly that,
“House Republicans work to gather 218 signatures to force a vote on H.R. 336,
allowing [encouraging] governments to avoid contracting with firms that support
BDS.” This is how the Jewish leaders exercise power on the mentally retarded
captains of the democracies.
Tired of waiting for God to show that he meant it when he said he
chose the Jews to be his favorite children, the Jewish leaders fabricated a
close substitute to that saying. They decided to make the governments of the
democracies adopt the Jews as their favorite children by imposing them on their
public.