When
toddlers do something they are not supposed to, and they are asked about it,
most of them lie. The reason they do, is that they have no idea how resourceful
the adults can be at discovering the truth.
When
teenagers do something they are not supposed to, and they are asked about it,
some of them lie. The reason they do, is that they hope the adults will not
bother checking the veracity of their assertion.
When
adults do something that's contrary to what is expected of them, and they are
asked about it, a small minority will look you in the eye, and with a straight
face lie to you. The reason they do, is to communicate the utter contempt they
have for you, knowing that you know they are lying. It is their way of saying:
I don't care what you think of me; I did what pleases me and you can go to
hell.
There
was a time when the mouthpieces of the Jewish establishment in America used to
act like teenagers handling the truth. They would tell lies hoping that nobody
will check the veracity of what they said. And the Jews had good reason to so
believe. It is that America's politico-journalistic crowd worshiped them,
believing they were chosen to be more important than the rest of us. And so,
the Americans treated everything that was uttered by the Jews as gospel truth,
and did not bother verifying it.
But
then, bit by bit, it dawned on some Americans that maybe the Jews are not what
they are cracked up to be. And so, they started checking the Jewish assertions.
They discovered that lying is the beating heart of the Jews. If they stop
lying, they die, and so they don't stop lying till they die. When the Jews
became aware of what was happening, they modified their communicating
techniques. Instead of telling outright lies, they began to confuse their
audiences by telling half-truths and ambiguities, as well as communicating the
simultaneous and contradictory narratives they are famous for.
You
can see an example of that in a piece that was commissioned by the Likud party
of Israel, and published by its most trusted mouthpiece in America: The New
York Post. It is an editorial that came under the title: “Behind the
Israel-Islamic Jihad flareup,” and published on September 16, 2019.
The
editorial begins with the question: “What's up with the latest hostilities
between Israel and Islamic Jihad?” and uses the rest of the space to answer the
question. It takes little time for the reader to establish that the committee
which wrote that piece was interested in achieving two goals. It wanted to say
that Israel's action was not an assassination –– which would have made it a war
crime, and possibly a crime against humanity –– but that it was a response to a
specific Palestinian provocation.
The
committee also wanted to say that the Palestinians are terrorists whereas the
Jews are not. The way the committee tried to achieve this goal, was to claim
that by launching rockets at Israel, the Palestinians “intended” to kill
civilians but failed, which is unacceptable behavior despite the failure. At
the same time, however, the Jews retaliated, “intending” to kill Palestinian
combatants but killed civilians instead, which is acceptable collateral,
according to the infamous editorial.
So,
here is a condensed version of the piece that was published by the editors of
the New York Post:
“Palestinian
Islamic Jihad (PIJ) fired a rocket at Ashdod, timed to hit as Netanyahu was
taking the stage in a campaign rally. It was an effort to humiliate Bibi and
turn the election. Israel waited until it had a clear shot at Baha Abu al-Ata.
It pinned down his location; a jet launched a missile, killing the terrorist
and his wife and leaving the rest of the apartment building untouched, though
several of their children were reported wounded. PIJ's response was to launch
rockets indiscriminately at civilian Israeli targets –– most intercepted by the
Iron Dome defense system or hitting only empty ground. Israel answered with its
own attacks on PIJ military targets, with greater success”.
With
that, the editors of the New York Post are saying that the Israelis did not
assassinate Baha Abu al-Ata as a matter of policy; they killed him in response
to the Palestinians launching a rocket that was meant to disrupt a Netanyahu
rally, and that’s provocation enough. But the English headline in the November
14, 2019 edition of the Israeli publication Haaretz, reads as follows: “Israel
Approved al-Ata's Assassination Two years Ago, but Postponed It Several Times.”
Clearly then, the editors of the New York Post lied; and did so knowingly and
deliberately to hide Israel’s war crime and crime against humanity.
The
editors also said that the bomb which killed al-Ata and his wife left the
building untouched except for the children who were wounded. By that, the
editors have suggested that no one but the man and his wife were killed. But
the Israelis have been bragging about the big ball of fire that was caused by
the explosion. In fact, they filmed the ball of fire and have been showing the
video clip with great pride around the world, as the symbol of their military
prowess.
And
then, the same Haaretz article with the headline about the premeditated
assassination of al-Ata, clearly stated that at least five (that’s 5)
Palestinians were killed and dozens were injured. Clearly then, the editors of
the New York Post lied; and did so knowingly and deliberately to hide Israel’s
war crime and crime against humanity.
It
is not that these editors don't know the truth is out there; they know it as
well as anyone. And yet they lied, knowing that someone will point that out.
So, why did they lie?
They
lied because lying is a disease which they cannot be cured of it. It is why
they are known as pathological liars –– a pathology being a clinically diagnosed
disease.