Wednesday, November 6, 2019

What we did is wrong but we're correct anyway

There are many levels of accountability, the sincerest being the recognition by the offender that he did something wrong, and offers to atone for the damage that his behavior may have caused. A good example of that at the international level is Germany that has been paying good money for the sins of the Nazis –– to those that deserve being compensated and those that do not.

At the other extreme of the spectrum, you have the Jews of Israel and America whose horrific crimes have no parallel in the history of the planet. They push away, and they continue to push away the Palestinians that have lived on their land since the beginning of time. And the Jews populate the vacancies they create with losers from around the world simply because they call themselves Jews.

And then, instead of offering to compensate the Palestinians for what they have done to them, the Jews came up with a scheme that would have the rich Arab countries pay them for the crime of looting the Palestinians, and for ethnic cleansing their land by pushing them out of it. Imagine the upside-down accountability that the Jews practice in their everyday living.

Between the two extreme views of accountability, you'll find an America that was loved, honored and appreciated for being like the first example of accountability. But during the half century of Judeo-Yiddish cultural occupation that the country has endured, it became contaminated with the upside-down culture of the Jews, and was forced to shift its moral stance to a point that lies between the two extremes.

If now, you think of the moral reserve of a nation as being a pool that's equipped with several spigots to replenish it, and one drain to empty it, you can visualize America's moral reserve as being a pool that's being replenished by a nativist Protestant and a Catholic spigots, both of which are steadily getting smaller. The pool is also being replenished by a Jewish spigot that is steadily getting bigger, as well as an Evangelical spigot that spits poison into the pool.

More and more, the American pool is being drained of its old nativist morality; the one rooted in Protestant ethics and Catholic devotion. It is being replenished with a Judeo-Yiddish morality that is doped with the poison of the Evangelical hypocrisy. The result is what you see in two articles which are rooted in Judaism and have appeared on the same day, November 4, 2019 in two different publications.

Jonathan S. Tobin, the Jew wrote: “40 years after launching hostage crisis, Iran less trustworthy than ever,” an article that was published in the New York Post. As to the Jewish editors of the New York Daily News, they came up with a piece they wrote under the title: “The other cold war,” and the subtitle: “America and Iran have been locked in a standoff for 40 years, and Tehran's anti-American, anti-Israel posture is to blame”.

To pursue the upside-down logic that is meant to deceive the readers and that works for them, the Jewish editors of the New York Daily News pulled the chronological trick, which the Jews are famous for. The editors began the piece by saying: “It began 40 years ago,” suggesting that Iran began the misbehavior in 1979. But then, the editors admitted in the next paragraph that it all began in 1953, which is 26 years before 1979.

And that happens to be the time when the following took place, as admitted to by the editors: “We do not say the US acted correctly when a military coup backed by the CIA toppled the government of Iran and installed the Shah of Iran.” From there, the editors went on to assert that: Yes, what we did was wrong but we were correct anyway, and the Iranians have been wrong all along.

That is the kind of Jewish morality which has been replenishing the American pool for the last half century, pushing down the drain the strait-as-arrow ethics which the Protestants and the Catholics brought to America five centuries ago. You can also detect that same twisted logic expressed in the Jonathan Tobin article.

He too pulled the chronological trick that the Jews are famous for. He said early on that Iran commemorated the events of 40 years ago with new provocations. This being that the Iranians brought online a new set of advanced nuclear centrifuges in violation of the pledges they made in the 2015 nuclear deal.

Having first called this move a provocation without mentioning the cause that produced it, Jonathan Tobin then mentioned the cause, which is that Donald Trump had pulled America out of the nuclear deal. Thus, by reversing the order of cause and effect, Tobin has managed to make the upside-down logic sound like it is Jewish okay.

The writer went even further, and traced the origin of this whole mess, not to the American incident (the cause) that took place in 1953, but to the Iranian incident (the effect) that took place in 1979.

And this is yet one more piece of evidence that no one screws the causality relationship like do the Jews.