The editors of the Washington Times began their latest piece of work by giving a lecture on the concept of “common sense”.
The
trouble is that the deeper you get into their editorial, the more you find that
you cannot keep your eyebrows from rising. It is that the first thing which
hits you in the face like a baseball bat is a quote they attribute to Donald
Trump when he called something a “real beauty.” Perhaps he meant to say that
January 6 was a real beauty. Someone more balanced might have called it a real
doozy.
Whatever
the case, the editorial is there for you to read and be puzzled. It came under
the title: “Getting the best of Biden,” and the subtitle: “President’s
dealmaking can only lead to a nuclear Iran.” It was published on August 11,
2021 in the Washington Times.
The
editors complain that President Biden is determined to restore the nuclear deal
despite Iran’s hostile posture. This is why they believe he dabbles more in
nonsense than common sense. So, you look for any sign of common sense in what
the editors are preaching, and find only a jumbled mass of nonsense. What it
all comes down to, is a rant aimed at sabotaging the potential restoration of
the Iran nuclear deal. It would be the deal that former President Donald Trump
reneged on when he was demonically pushed to do so by the Judeo-Yiddish
syndicate.
Bear
in mind that it is the Jews of America and Israel who toot their horns every
time that Israel carries out an operation against Iran, whether they succeed
like when the operation is of a terrorist kind — a Jewish specialty since the 1920s — or it is a tit
for tat kind of operation where they fail miserably like when they carry out a
cyberattack or an air attack on the Iranians, and the Jews come out with a
bloody nose and a humiliating kick in the ass.
The
latest round of tit for tat started by Israel when it discovered that it had a
low-level expertise in both cyberwarfare and the air war. It is that Israel
gets caught every time it conducts a cyberattack, which the Iranians detect and
spoil. Also, Israel keeps bombing Iranian positions in Syria; attacks that fail
to roil the Iranians who are well defended. It is for these reasons that the
Israelis are now trying their luck at sea. They started attacking Iranian ships
supplying Syria with oil. But they soon discovered that they are losing
miserably there too and so, they tried to make the battle on the seas, an
American problem.
This
is the effort you see exerted by the editors of the Washington Times on the
Biden administration in their attempt to connect Israel’s defeat on the sea
with the idea of America reentering the Iran nuclear deal. But aware of this
kind of tricks being used by the Jewish lobby, the Biden administration brushed
them aside and moved surefootedly towards a deal that is clamored for by all of
humanity. So, you want to know how the editors of the Washington Times
responded to that? They whined is how they responded. Here is how they did it:
“Biden’s Secretary of State Antony Blinken
has responded. The United States is ‘fully prepared’ to overlook the attacks,
he says, and keep the negotiations on track. If trust is a two-way
street, Iran is driving on the wrong side of the road, and Mr.
Blinken hasn’t noticed the coming crack-up. The deal that former President
Obama fashioned only attempted to delay, rather than derail, the Islamic
regime’s quest for nuclear weapons. The pact called for a pause until 2030 in
the most critical element of nuclearization — uranium enrichment — but it
lacked a foolproof method of verifying Iran’s compliance”.
Well,
whatever side of the track the editors of the Washington Times are driving,
their sense of what is logical leaves much to be desired. Here is why. They say
that without anything to restrain Iran from continuing to stockpile fissile
material, the Defense Minister of Israel has admitted that Iran is now just 10
weeks away from building a nuclear bomb if it chooses to do so.
So
then, how to prevent this from happening? The way to do it, say the editors of
the Washington Times, is not to negotiate a deal that will prevent Iran from making
the bomb. What was that again, you ask? You prevent Iran from making the bomb
by not negotiating a deal that will forbid Iran from making the bomb? What kind
of common sense is this?
Looking
for an explanation to this screwy logic in the Times editorial, you hit on this
piece of rant:
“The president has reportedly sent US
diplomats to engage in preliminary talks with their Iranian counterparts in
Vienna. It’s a characteristic of human relations that dialogue is an effective
trust-building exercise. Characteristic of Iran, though, is to meet
American appeals with demonic indignation”.
But
what the hell are the editors doing except to tell the Biden administration to
meet humanity’s appeal for understanding and the eternal quest for peace, with
the characteristic Jewish indignation?
The
battle always comes down to the Jews pitting their will against that of
humanity. As it happens, humanity always wins and the Jews always lose. They
get roughed up pretty badly, ask for compensation, and start the cycle all over
again.
As Ronald Reagan would say: Here we go again.