What is the difference between characters such as the trio of Hitler, Mussolini and Pol Pot on one side, and Jewish Central on the other side? The difference is that each of the trio did what he did to control his country whereas Jewish Central is doing what it does to continue controlling America, a host country.
The effective way to control a country does
not necessarily depend on taking control of all its institutions. Depending on
the structural organization of the country, and the circumstances in which it
is going through at any time, one institution would stand out as key to the
control of the other institutions and ultimately the entire country.
In the case of Hitler and Mussolini, for
example, controlling the military was key to controlling the nation. As to Pol
Pot, controlling the internal security apparatus was key to controlling the
nation. When it comes to America at this point in its history, the internal
security apparatus is not important. The military is important but is not key.
What is key to controlling America, is to become the ultimate decider on how
the public money is spent. When you have that, you have control over foreign
policy, domestic policy, the military, higher education and just about
everything else.
Controlling America’s finances and maintaining
that control has always been the highest priority of Jewish Central. At the
domestic level, you can see them use finance to dictate to the universities
what they must do to acknowledge the supremacy of Jewish students. You also see
them dictate to the States how to turn their schools into factories for
producing Philo-Semites. And you see them dictate to American companies how to
deal with the BDS movement … and so on and so forth.
At the foreign policy level, Jewish Central
has instituted program after program to transfer money to Israel. Not one of the
programs was ever curtailed or ended. On the contrary, they were all increased time
after time. And while this is happening, the programs by which America transfers
money to other nations, are constantly looked into by Jewish Central. Whenever
a foreign nation fell out of favor with Israel, Jewish Central instructed
American treasury to reduce or eliminate the transfer to it. This is how Egypt
and the Palestinians saw their financial relationships with America refashioned
by Jewish Central.
Lest you believe that Jewish Central comes up
with sophisticated arguments that convince Treasury to take action, two recent
articles will convince you of the opposite. One article came under the title:
“House anti-Semites block funds for Israel’s Iron Dome,” written by Quin
Hillyer, and published in The Washington Examiner on September 22, 2021. The
other article came under the title: “The Squad convinces Democrats to weaken
Israel’s defenses,” written by Andrea Widburg, and published in The American
Thinker, also on September 22, 2021.
The following is a condensed version of how
Quin Hillyer expressed his sentiment when America’s elected representatives said
they’ll do what’s good for America, and not what’s good for Israel:
“Democrats proved themselves not just anti-Zionist,
but murderously antisemitic. They did this by forcing House leaders to strip a
measure that would have provided $1 billion to Israel to support its Iron Dome
system. There is no good reason, not a single one, to oppose a small American
funding stream. The arguments certainly aren’t fiscal: The same Squad who
forced the $1 billion to be stripped are simultaneously playing hardball in
favor of $3.5 trillion in new wasteful social spending. That’s
3,500 times as much money as would be saved if the Iron Dome never gets funded.
The caucus of Democratic House members who forced the Iron Dome funding to be
stripped must be named and shamed. Now, this group of eight might as well make
things formal by founding an anti-Semitic caucus”.
This is not the language of a supplicant who
is pleading with his donor to be more generous. It is the language of a master
that’s dressing down his slave for failing to produce up to his quota of
bananas from the plantation that’s under his care. The master’s bitterest
reprimand came because the American slave dared to prioritize social spending
on his own society rather than show preference for the foreign entity of Israel
that craves the money to ethnic cleanse the country it stole at gunpoint from
its owners.
So much for Quin Hillyer. As to Andrea Widburg,
here is what she said:
“If Jewish brains were computers, they'd have
fast processors (smart), but they'd mostly be running defective programs
(making them act stupid). That's the only way I can fathom my fellow Jews'
devotion to the Democrat party. Pro-Israel Democrats who rely on Jewish votes,
insisted they'd make sure that some other bill funded Iron Dome. House Majority
Leader Steny Hoyer said he plans to call for a vote later in the week on a bill
to fully fund the Iron Dome. What's frustrating is that it's likely that this
won't do a thing to change the fact that Jews vote Democrat and that their
devotion to the party is unswerving. As I said, my fellow American Jews
have great processors (brains) but lousy programs (political values and common
sense)”.
Actually, Andrea Widburg spoke too soon. Had
she waited 24 hours, she would have seen what Jewish programming has brought
for Israel. What happened was that Jewish Central got the billion dollars it sought.
This was made possible because, working in a “bipartisan”
way, Jewish Central conned an earlier Congress into passing a law that compels today’s
congress to give Israel the billions it wants, regardless as to how the contemporary
legislators assess the contemporary circumstances. This is how you subjugate a
country that’s not yours.
If there is anything that Andrea Widburg can learn from this experience, it is that the dumbos are not the schemers at Jewish Central. They are the male bimbos of the Steny Hoyer caliber who would give their mothers to a bordello, for the privilege of having a Jewish ass to kiss day and night.